MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7042417563

Passive sampling to understand and predict sources of wastewater and agricultural contamination in rural watersheds

2023· dissertation· en· W7042417563 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des ParcsUniversity of WaterlooMinistry of Environment
Mots-clésPassive samplingSampling (signal processing)SucraloseSTREAMSRange (aeronautics)WastewaterContaminationSurface water
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Passive sampling techniques have emerged as valuable tools in environmental monitoring, offering distinct advantages over traditional discrete sampling methods. Discrete sampling techniques are only representative of the time of sampling, often over or underestimating concentrations of constituents in flowing surface waters. Passive samplers contain a collecting medium which accumulates and concentrates constituents to a higher level of detection, and reduces variability associated with discrete sampling. To identify and differentiate non-point sources in rural catchments, this study used passive samplers, including the diffusive gradient in thin-films (DGT) and polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS), along with discrete sampling to detect a range of anthropogenic and agricultural tracers and nutrients. 
\nPassive samplers were deployed for select compounds including nutrients (PO4-P, NO3-N, NH4-N), anthropogenic tracers (caffeine, carbamazepine, gemfibrozil, ibuprofen, naproxen, sulfamethoxazole, acesulfame potassium, sucralose), and agricultural tracers (glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)). Among the passive samplers deployed, the Metsorb®-DGT, selective for phosphate-bearing compounds, was evaluated for competition impacts between PO4-P and glyphosate. Competition between analytes can occur for sorbents selective for a range of compounds with similar properties. A new sampler using a weak anion exchange (WAX) resin was developed for the uptake of artificial sweeteners acesulfame potassium (ACE-K) and sucralose (SUC).
\nPassive samplers were deployed at three distinct locations (Hamlet, Agricultural, and Mixed-land Sites), for 3 to 14 days, while discrete samples were collected every 3 days over 2 weeks in Fall of 2021 and Spring of 2022. The effect of potentially competing ions between phosphate-bearing compounds was evaluated by deploying triplicate Metsorb®-DGT sampler in a solution of high PO4-P and low glyphosate and AMPA. Strata-DGT samplers were developed as a potential sampler for the uptake of ACE-K and SUC and deployed in the Spring 2022 sampling event. The goals of this thesis were to (1) use DGT and POCIS to delineate anthropogenic contamination from agricultural activities to surface waters in rural communities, and to compare their effectiveness to discrete samples and (2) further develop and evaluate DGT samplers.
\nDGT and POCIS had comparable concentrations with 64% of compounds not statistically different (ρ > 0.05) from discrete samples. Diffusive boundary layer (DBL) corrections were applied to Spring 2022 DGT samples, increasing the mean absolute error between DGT concentrations (CDGT) and discrete concentrations (CACTIVE) by 32% for all compounds. Phosphate was elevated at the Hamlet Site (74 ± 8.2 µg L-1) in discrete samples compared to the Agriculture Site during the Fall 2021 sampling season. The Hamlet Site land use was 40% urban and 60% agriculture, while the Agriculture and Mixed-land Sites were 94% and 88% agricultural land use, respectively. Tracers consistently showed elevated concentrations of ACE-K (412 ± 202 µg L-1) and SUC (17,089 ± 5370 µg L-1) in discrete samples across both sampling seasons as well as all other anthropogenic tracers at the Hamlet Site, while glyphosate and AMPA were elevated at the Agriculture Site (0.86 ± 1.66 µg L-1 and 1.41 ± 0.85 µg L-1, respectively). Principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation coefficients indicated a positive relationship between phosphate and anthropogenic tracers at the Hamlet Site. Biological markers (Human-specific Bacteroides), specific to human fecal contamination, were also elevated at the Hamlet Site compared to the other sites. The results of this study clearly show septic system contamination in a headwater stream and suggest impacts of septic systems to these surface water bodies may be an underappreciated nonpoint source of nutrients. 
\nThere was no apparent competition on the Metsorb®-DGT sampler at initial concentrations of 104 µg L-1 of PO4-P, 0.372 µg L-1 of glyphosate, and 2.14 µg L-1 of AMPA as uptake was mostly linear after 6 days of deployment. Strata X-AW resin was not a suitable binding medium for artificial sweeteners, resulting in concentrations only 39% of discrete samples for ACE-K at the Hamlet Site. 
\nOverall, an array of passive samplers was helpful to distinguish nonpoint sources of septic system from agricultural contamination in rural head-water streams. Passive samplers generally showed comparable results to discrete samples, with the exception of ACE-K, and reduced the variability and additional sampling and analysis associated with discrete sample collection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,276
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,640

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTravaux en français237 207