Planejamento baseado em capacidades como potencializador da interoperabilidade: as experiências australiana e canadense transformadas em insumos para o caso do Brasil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The post-Cold War scenario was an important catalyst in the search for changes in the way military affairs and operations were conducted, given that the threat to States was no longer focused specifically on a country to be something more diffuse, difficult to identify, as the challenges presented by transnational crime and terrorism. Through Defense Transformation greater attention was given to joint military operations in order to advocate integration between the different branches of the Armed Forces. In this context, there is a tendency of change regarding the adopted defense planning model. It used to plan focusing on a particular threat, however, more and more countries have opted for the adoption of Capabilities-Based Planning (CBP), a methodology that, among its characteristics, promotes greater interoperability (systems, units or forces capable of exchanging services and/or information). The objective of this research is to understand how this joint planning methodology contributes to improve interoperability, based on the analysis of experiences in Australia and Canada, with the aim to provide inputs for thinking about the case of Brazil. The development of the study was based on the hypothesis that this improvement takes place through the intensification of organizational integration, which occurs through the deepening of joint structures, provided by the instruments of the joint systematics. The progress of the investigation was guided by a methodological strategy, structured from the Comparative Study method and the tools of cross case analysis, the study of few cases (small-n) and the Most Similar System Design. From the study of the experiences of Australia and Canada, it was possible to conclude that the CPB promotes a joint perspective that influences the entire defense structure, from the ministerial level to the service level. Adopting a top-down approach, standardizing the taxonomy of the process, creating permanent joint commands, and military capabilities being jointly planned and developed are some of the contributions of the CBP to the interoperability and jointness process. These results allowed to conclude that Brazil, a country in the initial phase of its implementation of the CBP, can incorporate many of the lessons bequeathed by these countries, in order to develop a process that is less affected by the rigid structures of defense.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».