MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7042525512

A proposal for a value sensitive design approach to modelling the refugee chain

2017· other· en· W7042525512 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueTU/e Research Portal · 2017
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefugeeFlexibility (engineering)Process (computing)Value (mathematics)Developing countryRobustness (evolution)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The world currently faces high levels of refugees. By the end of 2016 there were 22.5 million refugees (http://www.unhcr.org/5943e8a34.pdf) across the globe. Amongst the main countries of asylum for refugees were Germany, Italy, Turkey and Islamic Republic of Iran (http://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2016/). Hosting countries experience several challenges in terms of logistics for refugees. The main reason is because the influx of refugees is not nicely distributed over time, capacity to host refugees at fixed places is limited, and procedures to either grant them a status or send them back have unknown length (Jensen & Hertz, 2016). Creating an efficient logistics procedure is very difficult since a high amount of flexibility (being able to cope with varying sizes of refugee streams, changing places, length of stay) is needed, as well as robustness (when refugee camps are closed or other means of support are suddenly unavailable). Note that there are different levels of efficiency. Daily processes have to be done efficiently (food, sleep, bathing, etc.), but also setting up language classes, sports activities and education facilities for children. Although many countries do their utmost to facilitate this process, there remains a risk of ‘protraction’, which means that a refugee is getting trapped for decades in the refugee migration and asylum process (Frydenlund & Padilla, 2017; Vernon-Bido, Frydenlund, Padilla, & Earnest, 2017) and another risk is that hosting countries lose societal support for supporting refugees (Oltermann, 2016).We approach the problem through an ethically oriented agent-based approach in which agents represent the different stakeholders and support organizations in the refugee process (Hiel, Aldewereld, & Dignum, 2011). This approach of modelling should give right to the different perspectives, rights, ethical concerns and values of each stakeholder. Simulations serve as a means of communication between the stakeholders showing them the concerns and potential clashes between values of other stakeholders and what are possible solutions involving the cooperation of several parties. An adapted version of the Value Sensitive Design method will be used to integrate issues of ethical importance in a systematic way into the logistical model. VSD is a tripartite design methodology, which implies conceptual, empirical and technical investigations, employed iteratively (Friedman, Kahn, & Borning, 2006). Many classifications of values have been proposed by several authors, see for example the Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design (van den Hoven, Vermaas, & van de Poel, 2015). Examples of values are privacy, responsibility, safety, freedom, sustainability, equality. We propose a different, more holistic approach to values, by using Dooyeweerd’s theory of modal aspects (Dooyeweerd, 1969) as a means to systematically map different values of the stakeholders. It distinguishes for example economic value, juridical value, social value, psychological value, religious value, moral value and aesthetic value. This project aims to contribute theoretically to Value Sensitive Design research in two ways: (i) by using Dooyeweerd’s theory of modal aspects to create a novel and systematic overview of different values and (ii) to apply Value Sensitive Design to the case of Agent Based Modelling and social simulations, which is novel. This project aims to contribute to society at large, by creating a tool for policy makers which should inform decision concerning humanitarian logistics in an ethically informed manner.ReferencesDooyeweerd, H. (1969). A New Critique of Theoretical Thought,The General Theory of the Modal Spheres (2nd ed., Vol. 2). The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Frydenlund, E., & Padilla, J. J. (2017). Modeling the Impact of Protraction on Refugee Identity. In D. Lee, Y.-R. Lin, N. Osgood, & R. Thomson (Eds.), Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: 10th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2017, Washington, DC, USA, July 5-8, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 214–222). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_25Hiel, M., Aldewereld, H., & Dignum, F. (2011). Modeling Warehouse Logistics Using Agent Organizations. In C. Guttmann, F. Dignum, & M. Georgeff (Eds.), Collaborative Agents - Research and Development: International Workshops, CARE@AI09 2009 / CARE@IAT10 2010, Melbourne Australia, December 1, 2009 and Toronto Canada, August 31, 2010, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 14–30). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22427-0_2Jensen, L.-M., & Hertz, S. (2016). The coordination roles of relief organisations in humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(5), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1124845Oltermann, P. (2016, March 14). Merkel refuses to abandon refugee policy despite election setbacks. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/14/angela-merkel-refuses-to-abandon-refugee-policy-despite-election-setbacksvan den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P. E., & van de Poel, I. (2015). Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design. Springer Netherlands: Imprint: Springer,.Vernon-Bido, D., Frydenlund, E., Padilla, J. J., & Earnest, D. C. (2017). Durable Solutions and Potential Protraction: The Syrian Refugee Case. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Simulation Symposium (p. 19:1–19:9). San Diego, CA, USA: Society for Computer Simulation International. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3106388.3106407

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,004
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0050,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,131
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTU/e Research PortalMême sujetVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsTravaux en français237 207