Primary care case management of culturally diverse dementia patients and caregivers, a pilot cross-sectional study in a Montreal Family Medicine Group
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Pending the arrival of definitive treatment for dementia -an increasingly common neurodegenerative illness, clinicians look to better utilize available resources to improve patients' and their informal caregivers' quality of life.Case management is an innovative model of care and has been implemented in Quebec in select primary care clinics called Family Medicine Groups (FMG).Often nurses or social workers (also called "infirmiers-pivot" in French), case managers assess and follow dementia patients, coordinating their care and collaborating closely with other members of the healthcare team.However, little evidence exists on how this model of dementia care navigates culturally sensitive contexts, especially given the rich and diverse cultural landscape of Quebec and Montreal.Objectives: To determine the ethnocultural diversity of dementia patients and their informal caregivers of the Herzl Family Practice Centre, a FMG using case management; to determine whether Canadian born and foreign born service users had different needs and problems.Methods: 15 community-dwelling dementia patients and their 15 informal caregivers were recruited.We report descriptive statistics of their sociodemographic, ethnocultural, memory and health characteristics, in addition to (a) patient needs using the Camberwell Assessment of Need for Elderly (CANE) and (b) caregiver problems and needs using the Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D).Dementia severity was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).We describe differences between Canadian born and foreign born study participants (hypothesis generating).Results: The 15 patients were on average 76.5 years old (sd: 9.2, range: 61-91), of which 10 were men, still in the early stages of cognitive decline with a mean MoCA of 22.7 (3.4,15-27).Patients reported "memory", "physical health", "money/budgeting" as common needs, and received both informal and formal help to meet most needs.The 15 caregivers were aged 72.3 years old (12.5, 41-90), with 12 women.They reported "physical or psychiatric illness" and "lack of information about dementia", "about treatment" and "about services" as common problems.They received adequate "diagnosis or treatment" from the family physician, but their needs for "support from a social worker", "printed information material" and other services were not met.Compared to their 5 Canadian born counterparts, the 10 foreign born patients had more needs (and different needs) and a lower quality of life.This may be explained by their older age, longer onset of memory symptoms, worse cognition and more behavioral symptoms.The 9 foreign born caregivers were younger than their 6 Canadian born peers, but reported more stress associated with their patient's behavioral symptoms, more problems (and different problems) and more needs (and different needs) for services.Conclusion: These findings may be clinically impactful in the care of our patient population, albeit statistically insignificant due to the small sample size.Valuable insight was gained about the conduct of research with this vulnerable population.The role that cultural diversity can play in the complex environment of dementia case management merits further investigation, in order to better serve all members of a population already vulnerable by age and disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».