Review of <i>Epic Wanderer: David Thompson and the Mapping\nof the Canadian West</i> By D'Arcy Jenish
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
David Thompson, often known as "the great mapmaker," spent twenty-five years traveling the entire West and Northwest of North America, covering 75,000 miles by canoe, horseback, and foot, and in the process produced the first comprehensive map of this vast region of about 1.2 million square miles. He then spent many years surveying the new 49th parallel boundary between the United States and Canada.\nD'Arcy Jenish has produced, according to his publisher, the first full-length biography of Thompson-in that previous works have not given much consideration to his early and declining years-and has done a creditable job of following and explaining Thompson's travels in the West. The book describes in some detail how Thompson worked to achieve the precision characteristic of his surveying, the key to which was his innumerable astronomical observations taken with infinite care under often extremely adverse conditions. These allowed Thompson to fix the exact position of thousands of points across the West, which, coupled with his careful running surveys between these points, yielded maps of unprecedented accuracy.\nThe book does not seem to cover much new ground or reveal any new research. There are no new answers to the question of precisely what drove him in 1797 to leave the Hudson's Bay Company and take up with the North West Company, and no new reasons why Thompson suddenly gave up his life in the wilderness in 1812 and started living in the first house of his own as a sedentary farmer and land investor-the latter being what ultimately got him into so much trouble and left him a pauper. And there is nothing new that might explain better why Thompson took so long to reach the mouth of the Columbia in 1810, when his company's-and even his country's-fortunes depended on it. He arrived at the Pacific to find Fort Astoria already built and occupied by the men of Jacob Astor's rival Pacific Fur Company. Has all we are going to uncover about David Thompson already been found?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».