Report of Working Group 21 on Non-indigenous Aquatic Species
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aquatic non-indigenous species (NIS) continue to threaten marine ecosystems, including seafood safety and security.To inform risk assessments predicting the likelihood and consequences of new invasions, it is critical to understand global NIS distributions, habitat tolerances/preferences, potential dispersal vectors and probable impacts related to new incursions.To this end, the NIS database developed by the North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES) Working Group on Non-Indigenous Aquatic Species (WG 21), with funding from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) of Japan through the Fisheries Agency of Japan, summarizes large-scale data which can be used by managers to develop monitoring programs for early detection or rapid response, and to make mitigation plans for higher-risk NIS to limit the impacts on native biodiversity, including commercially important species, and ecosystem structure and function.The Atlas of Non-indigenous Marine and Estuarine Species in the North Pacific, compiled through the activities of WG 21, synthesizes information from a variety of sources and can serve as a valuable resource for agencies and scientists tasked with managing and researching NIS in the North Pacific.Information included in the Atlas can help to identify and prioritize potential high-risk NIS and/or high-risk locations which can allow limited funding to be used effectively.The usefulness of the Atlas was illustrated most recently by the arrival of a large floating dock in Newport, Oregon, USA that had been set adrift by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami -this document was consulted by experts to aid in the identification and ecological risk assessment of organisms attached to the dock.Another lasting outcome from activities of WG 21 has been increased awareness and collaboration on NIS issues broadly, especially between PICES member countries and with developing countries and international organizations like the Northwest Pacific Action Plan (NOWPAP) and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission's Sub-Commission for the Western Pacific (WESTPAC), fostered through Rapid Assessment Surveys (RAS) and RAS demonstration workshops.Capacity building has better prepared researchers both within and beyond PICES to deal with emerging NIS issues and is critical to better understanding invasion dynamics and maintaining safe and productive marine ecosystems.Executive Summary viii PICES Scientific Report No. 48 Understanding Trends, Uncertainty and Responses of North Pacific Ecosystems) program and the North Pacific Ecosystem Status Report.Thus, at a minimum PICES should establish an expert group that can continue to exchange information on changing marine NIS dynamics via the WG 21 NIS database.A continued NIS expert group could explore how climate change will alter NIS distributions around the North Pacific, including probable changes in NIS vectors (e.g., new shipping routes, expanding trade).Further, a new expert group could address how PICES member countries have been affected by NIS and what community responses have occurred due to NIS incursions in the North Pacific, an element directly aligned with FUTURE.This information would help inform policy and management options within each PICES member country.WG 21 proposed several options for PICES' continued involvement in marine NIS issues, but the creation of an Advisory Panel on Aquatic Non-indigenous Species (AP-NIS) is the preferred option as it would allow continued progress on marine NIS issues, with the lowest resource commitment.This report summarizes the activities and accomplishments of WG 21 in fulfilment of its terms of reference, and recommends the establishment of an Advisory Panel on Non-indigenous Aquatic Species to continue work on NIS in the North Pacific.Section 1 Background
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».