RADARSAT Antarctic Mapping Project: Proceedings of the Post Antarctic Imaging Campaign-I Working Group Meeting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The RADARSAT-I Antarctic Mapping Project (RAMP) is a partnership between the Canadian Space Agency and the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The goal of the project is to create the first, complete high-resolution radar mosaic of all of Antarctica for studies of Antarctic glaciology, geology, coastal processes and climate. The major participants in RAMP are The Ohio State University, The Alaska SAR Facility, The Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Vexcel Corporation.\nPhase-I of the project was the Antarctic Imaging Campaign-I (AIC-I). The AIC-I occurred during the period September 9, 1997 through October 20, 1997 and utilized the unique attributes of the Canadian RADARSAT-I to acquire the first, high-resolution, synthetic aperture imagery covering the entire Antarctic Continent. Although the primary goal of the AIC-I was the acquisition of image data, the nearly flawless execution of the mission enabled additional collections of exact repeat orbit data. These data, covering an extensive portion of the interior Antarctic, are potentially suitable for interferometric analysis of topography and surface velocity.\nThe international Antarctic Mapping Advisory Group (AMAG) was convened on November 18, 1997 to review phase-I and to discuss phase-2 of the project, the completion of the digital mosaic. The meeting was held at the Byrd Polar Research Center of The Ohio State University. Along with members of AMAG, attendees included representatives from the Canadian Space Agency and NASA. Results of the meeting are presented in this report.\nThis report summarizes the chronology of the AIC and describes the various data sets obtained. This report also contains a scientific assessment of the data. It was generally concluded that the RAMP data represent a new, quantitative view of Antarctica. Highlights include the discovery of new ice streams, changing locations of ice margins and the potential for using imagery as a proxy indicator of subglacial geology. This stimulated much discussion on how the data will be applied to problems of Antarctic geoscience.\nFuture plans were also discussed. Two Antarctic Imaging Campaigns are proposed as part of the Radarsat Antarctic Mapping Project. The second AIC is tentatively scheduled to occur two years after AIC-1. However, the consensus view of the science and operational communities is to delay AIC-2 until sometime later in the RADARSAT-I program if practical. This will maximize opportunities for change detection studies. The report also addresses options for planning AIC-2 in light of the operational and scientific lessons learned from AIC-1.\nRAMP's extraordinary success in achieving pre-mission objectives is a result of the exceptional cooperation and commitment of many individuals in Canada and the US. This level of commitment will continue through the final map production to guarantee that the full scientific value of this rich data set is available to the international science community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».