Reproducibility and reusability in deep reinforcement learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reinforcement learning (RL) has been shown to be an effective mechanism for learning complex tasks via interaction with the environment.Recent advances in combining deep neural networks with RL have resulted in powerful tools that outperform previous stateof-the-art methods for many domains including: robotics, video games, and board games.However, due to the interactive nature of these algorithms, as well as both intrinsic and extrinsic stochasticity, learning performance can be highly variant and difficult to reproduce.Furthermore, reusing information between tasks using these techniques can be problematic since they may overfit to a single task or environment.In this thesis, we investigate both reproducibility and reusability in deep RL.We begin by demonstrating the difficulty in reproducing a subset of deep RL algorithms: policy gradient methods for continuous control.We propose guidelines for rigorous experimental methodology and several statistical methods to help prevent misleading results.Next, we provide open-source reproducible environments for multitask RL.We evaluate simple sequential learning on sets of these tasks to show their effectiveness as benchmarks for multitask learning.Finally, we leverage these benchmark environments to investigate the notion of reusability.We focus on one-shot transfer learning in inverse RL.That is, given expert demonstrations from a mixture of environments with different dynamics is it possible to learn to properly complete a task in a previously unseen environment with different dynamics.To do this, we extend the options framework with the notion of reward options and develop a method for learning join reward-policy options in the context of generative adversarial inverse RL.This method is able to reuse information from a mixture of different environments to successfully learn a task in its current environment and significantly outperforms inverse RL without options.i This thesis could not have been completed without the support, advice, and generosity of many people.Both of my supervisors, David Meger and Joelle Pineau, always go above and beyond in their support, constantly finding time and ways to help when I thought it would not be possible.They are role models for both their students and what supervisors should be, and I am extremely grateful for this.David Meger has been an amazing supervisor in encouraging me to pursue interesting problems, always being around for helpful and enlightening discussions, and understanding of an unusual path to the completion of this thesis.Equally, Joelle Pineau is a fantastic supervisor who is always there for her students no matter what, is a constant source of wise advice and steady support, and has helped me become a better researcher than I thought possible.I would also like to thank all my co-authors on publications stemming from the ideas in this thesis.The discussions, encouragement, and help from all co-authors made these impactful ideas possible.A special thank you to my family for inspiration and support throughout this experience.In particular, my mother, Julia, is a source of inspiration for overcoming adversity against all odds and I am
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».