REoccupy Your Life: Occupational displacement research guides program for criminal justice offenders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: Criminal justice settings significantly restrict an inmate’s occupational opportunities and promote occupational injustice and deprivation (Muñoz & Farnworth, 2009). Including healthy occupational choices and engagement opportunities during incarceration and measures of engagement in outcomes provides a potentially more effective way to measure success in community reintegration of offenders (Molineux & Whiteford, 1999). Using a form of action research, an occupation-based OT pilot program “REoccupy Your Life” was implemented with inmates enrolled in a community corrections facility drug treatment program. The program was based on the outcomes of a previously conducted mixed-method study that examined the utility of occupation-based assessments and examined the connections between occupational engagement, role diversity, and substance abuse (White & Rogers, 2011). The theme of occupational displacement (White, 1999; White & Rogers, 2011) was identified as a common experience of the participants and was a key concept used to develop an intervention designed to prepare participants for transition into crime-/substance-free community living. Intervention begins while offenders reside in the community corrections facility and continues as they transition into the community to support the transfer of skills learned in the facility to community living. Collaborative (Corrections Staff, offenders, & OTs) analysis of the outcomes of this project will guide the development of phase 2 of the study.\nMethods:\nParticipants: 11 men and 10 women from a community corrections facility participated in the group-based educational activity sessions. 12 of 21 participants also had individual evaluations and goal-setting sessions. 10 offenders completed all 5 sessions.\nMeasures: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Clarke, 2003); Occupational Self-Assessment (OSA); Semi-structured interviews; Demographic data; Correctional Facility Data.\nAnalysis: Individual and group goal-setting determined the focus of the interactive educational sessions: 1) Sensory diet, processing, & self-regulation, 2) Occupy yourself: Priorities, time management, & self-identity 3) Basic budgeting (Occupy your finances), 4) Occupy your mind: ADHD & participation, 5) Social skills: Non-verbal communication & intentionality.\nAdditional topics addressed were sobriety, stable housing, parenting/family relationships, & prison to community as a cultural transition.\nResults: Analysis pending May 2012 completion.\nSummary: We apply the concept of occupational displacement in action research to a criminal justice setting through a pilot study that will inform the next step of study development contributing to occupational science while supporting successful community reintegration and countering occupational injustices.\nDiscussion Questions: How might concepts from occupational science and occupational justice be effective in advocating for more rehabilitative versus punitive programming in criminal justice? Considering a definition of Occupational displacement as: “when the demands of engaging in one occupation rule out, or at least place obstacles in the way of, engaging in another occupation, formerly pursued on a regular basis.” (White, 1999, p. 163), What assessment tools (e.g., control of life-circumstances, criminal thinking), research questions, or study methods might be useful in understanding occupational displacement and how it affects successful transition to community living? What other populations experience occupational displacement for which occupational science research would be beneficial and what would such a study look like? Assuming that displacement due to substance abuse and related crime has tipped the scales of these offenders’ occupational balance, how might the balance concept be used to help offenders avoid substance abuse and criminal behavior post-release How might the concept of cultural transition be used to support successful transition to community-living?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».