Sample return and the Canadian Space Agency: Ongoing activities and avenues for international collaboration
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canadian Planetary Exploration Overview: Broadly, the Canadian Space Agency's (CSA) planetary exploration program consists of participating in ongoing missions and conducting preparatory activities for missions yet to come.CSA's science goals are developed in conjunction with the Canadian academic community, and follow two general themes: (i) understanding the origin and evolution of planetary bodies within the solar system, and (ii) habitability and life detection.As these goals are squarely aligned with a variety of current and future sample return efforts, CSA -in collaboration with its international partners -has become increasingly involved in sample return mission operations and planning.OSIRIS-REx: CSA's first formal participation on a sample return effort is with the NASA-led Origins Spectral Interpretation Resource Identification Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) mission.OSIRIS-REx aims to return at least 60g of material from asteroid Bennu, a primitive carbon-rich B-type asteroid believed to contain organic materials [1].Canada's hardware contribution to the mission is the OSIRIS-REx Laser Altimeter (OLA) instrument (Fig. 1), built by MDA Corporation and led by Principal Investigator Dr. Mike Daly of York University.OLA is a scanning lidar that will provide highresolution 3D topographic information about the asteroid, helping provide geologic context for the spacecraft's spectral instruments and aiding selection of a site where samples can be collected safely [2].In return for its contribution of OLA and support of a number of mission Science Team members, Canada will receive 4% of the returned sample.A Canadian OSIRIS-REx Sample Advisory Committee is being targeted to assist in evaluating the appropriate curation partner and to review the proposed Curation Plan.This committee would seek input from international partners who have heritage in astromaterial curation.Upon successful return of the samples, Canada also aims to maximize the scientific use of its sample allocation, and would thus welcome discussions on potential sample access opportunities with interested parties. Mars Sample Return -Mission Architecture and Science Management:Mars Sample Return (MSR) remains one of the highest priorities of the international planetary science community.Because MSR is likely too large an endeavor to be taken on by any individual country or space agency, international cooperation will be paramount to reaching this goal successfully.Several agencies throughout the world are evaluating possible contributions to this multi-mission endeavor, with coordination efforts discussed through the International Mars Exploration Working Group (IMEWG).In 2014, IMEWG tasked the international Mars Architecture for the Return of Samples (iMARS) working group to define a mission architecture that could successfully achieve MSR and to outline a science management plan for the returned samples.Canada played a lead role in this effort, co-chairing both the science and engineering sub-teams.Over two years, the working group developed an extensive set of findings and recommendations, some of which have already been implemented.A summary presentation was presented at the Mars Exploration Payload Analysis Group (MEPAG) meeting in 2016 [3], with the full report expected to be published in fall of 2017. Mars Sample Return -Caching and Retrieval:One of the key findings from the iMARS team was that a minimum of three flight missions would be required to achieve MSR: (i) sample collection and caching; (ii) sample retrieval, and; (iii) Earth return.A number of open scientific, technical, and operation questions remain open regarding the execution of the surface elements, (i) and (ii).With international cooperation coordinated via IMEWG, Canada led robotic field deployments near Hanksville, Utah (USA) to start answering some of these questions (Fig. 2).Science operations for the sample cache mission were conducted over four weeks spanning 2015 and 2016.The mission team conducted operations using a combination of rover-integrated sensors and hand-held instruments, successfully capturing eight scientifically-selected samples and developing an environmental reconstruction of the "landing site".Additionally, a two week deployment in 2016 utilized the rover in its sample retrieval configuration, demonstrating successfully the adaptive caching approach currently preferred by the Mars 2020 mission [4].These efforts have advanced international readiness for an eventual MSR campaign and paved the way for future deployments to further reduce risk.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,024 | 0,035 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,019 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,018 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,074 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».