The suburban neighborhood redefined: establishing diverse and socially connected 21st century housing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis examines how 21st century suburban housing can influence the creation of \ndiverse social community. Extensive research, community engagement, multi-disciplinary \ninterviews, and in-field site analysis of 21st century Milton neighborhoods has revealed \nthe need for integration of social and cultural expression of identity within new housing \ndevelopment models and has highlighted possible solutions. The suburbs are historically \nknown for low density housing, and occupancy by middle-class nuclear families.1 \n Today it \ncan be said that the ‘image’ or perception of the ‘typical suburban resident’ hardly exists. \n2 \nResidential suburban towns and cities have continually evolved to respond to the shift in \nsuburban demographics. They now attempt to include smaller and higher density housing \nfor lower- income households and diverse occupant populations. In order to accommodate \nthe current housing demands new suburban residential development models have been \ncreated. Local officials, urban planners, architects, and developers have each contributed \nto the redesign of suburban neighborhood housing to meet the diverse demographical \nneeds. Within this redesign a primary element of historic suburban neighborhoods has \nbeen overlooked. This is the consideration for social community integration and culturally \ndiverse inclusivity. \nThrough a multidisciplinary exploration the search for reality and responsibility of today’s \nsuburban residential social structure and demographic trends will be discovered. The \nsuburban site analyzed for this study is Milton Ontario Canada, my hometown, the place \nthat has shaped my view of suburban life. Across the several disciplines and jurisdictions \nthat contribute to this town’s development of suburban neighborhoods, the analysis of \ncommunity identity is observed. Through community engagement survey research, \nthe sense of community within Milton’s residential neighborhoods is explored. This \nexploration of social and demographic foundations are analyzed to understand what type \nof community is being produced specifically within Milton’s new suburban neighborhoods. \nHistorically, change in residential housing typology was based on a combination of social, \ncultural, functional, and economic factors. \n3 \n These principles, re-imagined and integrated, \nwill discover a new suburban social community structure. This thesis will look at the \npossibility of a new suburbia, one that acknowledges diverse cultural appeal and focuses \non the needs of our current social, economic, and demographic conditions. The research \ncomposition consists of both geographical, and statistical analysis. Ultimately this study \nhas been informed by the local’s knowledge and perspective to build upon the community’s \nset needs. The goal is to conceive a means of accommodating shifting housing needs and \ncreate architectural, ethical, and urban integrity within suburbia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».