In-situ Geotechnical Investigation of Coastal Sediments with Regards to Sediment Remobilization Processes and Sediment Stability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Geotechnical parameters and soil behavior of coastal sediments impact sediment remobilization processes and stability. Therefore, they have the potential to be a key factor for the assessment and prediction of coastal erosion, coastal engineering activities, as well as naval applications. Most geotechnical in-situ methods have been developed for non-subaquaeous conditions or for offshore conditions with the availability of ship support. However, few field techniques have been developed for the coastal zone with strongly varying water elevations and energetic hydrodynamics, leading to a current gap in data availability and understanding of soil behavior in the intertidal and nearshore zones. This presentation provides an overview into most recent developments of portable free fall penetrometers for the in-situ characterization of surficial sediments in coastal areas, the use of wave gauges for pore pressure measurements in the coastal zone, and the use of remote sensing techniques for geotechnical characterization of beach sediments. Data examples will include results from field expeditions to the Arctic, Duck, North Carolina, Sylt, Germany, and Yakutat, Alaska, giving new insights into the relationship between soil behavior and coastal processes, but also raising new questions. Presenter Bio Nina Stark received a Diploma (MSc) in Geophysics in 2007 from the Westphalian Wilhelms University of Muenster, Germany. For her thesis (“Characterization of seafloor sediments using eXpendable Bottom Penetrometer) she collaborated with Dr. Thomas Wever from the Institute for Underwater Acoustics and Geophysics of the German Navy in Kiel. She finished her PhD in Marine Geotechnics in 2011 at MARUM-Center for Marine and Environmental Sciences at the University of Bremen, Germany. She worked on the “Geotechnical investigation of sediment remobilization processes using dynamic penetrometers” under the supervision of Prof. Achim Kopf. She was a postdoctoral fellow in 2011 in the marine geotechnics group at MARUM under supervision of Prof. Achim Kopf, and from 2012-2013, in the physical oceanography group at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, under the supervision of Dr. Alex Hay, before being appointed assistant professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech in Fall 2013. Her research focuses on coastal and marine geotechnics including instrument development, the geotechnical investigation of subaqueous sediment dynamics, beach dynamics, ocean renewable energies, navigation channel deepening and maintenance, beach trafficability, and remote site characterizations in coastal environments. She developed the free-fall penetrometer “Nimrod” in the framework of her PhD, and collaborated with BlueCDesigns on the design of “BlueDrop”. To-date she has conducted more than 50 field surveys in the North Sea, Baltic Sea, Northern Atlantic, Arctic, Northern, Central and Southern Pacific, as well as in a number of lakes and rivers. Nina has received the NSF CAREER award and the ONR Young Investigator award in 2018.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».