MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7043677721

Stories from the bags of four early career researchers because ‘It matters what stories we tell other stories with’:Diffracting The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction through posthuman, feminist materialist, and postqualitative research methods

2022· article· en· W7043677721 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePosthumanist Ethics and Activism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStorytellingForegroundingNarrativeFraming (construction)Feminist theoryPower (physics)Meaning (existential)Performativity
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In research practices, posthuman, feminist materialist, postqualitative (PHFMPQ) theories are characterised as difficult to make sense of (Ringrose et al., 2020). Yet such theories hold rich potentiality for thinking with and making with. As four early career researchers, known as the bag lady collective, we continually generate ways to put these theories to work (Albin-Clark et al., 2021). Our papers articulate our approaches to research that centre around working in and as a collective, and the power of storymaking and storytelling as bag-ladies.<br/><br/>Convenor: Louise Hawxwell <br/><br/>Discussant: Dr Jo Albin-Clark, Louise Hawxwell, Liz Latto &amp; Dr Julie Ovington <br/><br/>Paper 1: Playing with the potential of theory and the sensitivity of the medicine bundle as a feminist collective storytelling endeavour for early career research. - Dr Jo Albin-Clark <br/><br/>The bag lady collective is inspired by the power of stories, and we take our name from the work of the science fiction writer Ursula La Guin who posits that; ‘A novel is a medicine bundle, holding things in a particular, powerful relation to one another and to us.’ (2019 p.34). This paper draws on the notion of the medicine bundle as a storytelling framing for PHFMPQ theories where the human, non-human and more-than human bump, reposition, collide and intra-act. Medicine bundles exist in many indigenous cultures and are a collection of objects carried in a bag and worn about the body, whose meaning is more than the materiality and bound up with stories and meanings (Tamas, 2019). This paper contributes and problematises the medicine bundle as a collective generative feminist endeavour of early career research, that continually reworks storytelling and making as a site for making sense of high theory. <br/><br/>Paper 2: Exploring entangled ways of being through bag lady methodology in self study - Louise Hawxwell <br/><br/>This paper details a unique methodological approach from a doctoral self-study on outdoor relationships and teacher educator practices. Self-study supports the development of an ‘understanding or explaining the physical or social world’ (LaBoskey, 2004, p.1173), without set rules or prescribed methods. I articulate methods used to re-imagine and craft my individual approach to self-study, underpinned by bag-lady storytelling that allows for the ‘collecting, carrying and telling the stuff of living’ (Haraway, 2019, p.10). I detail the use of methods that allow for ‘the knotting of capacities to respond, to become-with each other’ (Haraway, 2019, p.12), tracing the ways ‘particular kinds of entangled…relations produce certain ways of being’ (Taylor &amp; Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2019, p.2). My approach challenges the dominance of representational and traditional forms of research through acknowledging situated and relational knowledges, and ways of attuning to relationships with humans, more-than-humans. <br/><br/>Paper 3: Diffracting stories of lived experiences within an Early Learning and Childcare (ELC) setting to reveal the entangled nature of ‘becoming-practitioner’ - Liz Latto. <br/><br/>Drawing on data collected from a doctoral study, this paper utilises Barad’s concept and the creative potential of diffraction to ‘map where the effects of differences [when they] appear’ (2007, p. 72). Participants shared stories, both their own and each other’s, in a complex mapping of relations and entanglements. Through viewing relations of power and interactions as assemblages, and by utilizing concepts such as diffraction and ‘cutting-together-apart’ (Barad, 2007, 2014), the study is a (re)telling of how lived experiences and of becoming-practitioner is (re)enacted in an ongoing configuration. This paper contributes to a greater understanding of how structural inequalities continue to be (re)enforced through diffractive readings, enacted via I-poems, and through the richness of the stories shared, collected and held within both individual and shared memories. These provide a rich, textured account of how matter affects and is affected by the entangled nature of society and lived experience. <br/><br/>Paper 4: Fractured Identities: the affect of school readiness and neoliberalism in Early Education - Dr Julie Ovington. <br/><br/>Neoliberalism in Early Education and Care has become pervasive, leading to ‘inadvertent political and social consequences’ (Wood, 2003, cited in, Vintimilla, 2014, p. 80) by influencing the partitioner-child relationship through everyday activities in the classroom and beyond. This paper draws inspiration from Fairchild and Mikuska (2021, p. 1180) and ‘mobilizes (ordinary) affect’ to explore the affect of school readiness using empirical research with 8 early years practitioners working with two-year-old children. Thinking-with Le Guin’s Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction (2019), being human is to carry, to sustain, and to protect that which is important to us. This paper will story the practitioners personal and professional bags to reveal their fractured identities as enacted through the affect of school readiness. Through collecting and (re)telling these bag stories, a space is opened up for practitioners to consider ‘becoming-with each other’ to amplify and foreground the joyful experiences in practice to challenge neoliberalism ways of being. <br/><br/>References<br/>Albin-Clark, J., Latto, L., Hawxwell, H. &amp; Ovington, J. (2021). ‘Becoming-with response-ability: How does diffracting posthuman ontologies with multimodal sensory ethnography spark a multiplying femifesta/manifesta of noticing, attentiveness and doings in relation to mundane politics and more-than-human pedagogies of responseability?’. entanglements. 4(2), pp. 21-30 <br/>Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the universe halfway : quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. <br/>Barad, K. (2014) ‘Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart’. Parallax 20 (3), pp.168–187.<br/>Fairchild, N. &amp; Mikuska, E. (2021) ‘Emotional Labor, The Ordinary Affects, and the Early Childhood Education and Careworker.’ Journal of Gender, Work &amp; Organisation. 28 (3), pp.1177 - 1190. <br/>Haraway, D. (2019) The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. Ignota Books.<br/>LaBoskey, V.K. (2004) ‘Moving the methods of self-study research and practice forward: Challenges and opportunities’. In Loughran, J.J., Hamilton, M.J., LaBoskey, V.K., &amp; Russell, T. (eds.) International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2). pp.1169 - 1184. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. <br/>Le Guin, U.K., (2019). The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. Ignota Books.<br/>Ringrose, J., Osgood, J., Renold, E. &amp; Strom, K. (2020) ‘PhEmaterialism: Response-able Research &amp; Pedagogy’. Reconceptulaising Educational Research Methodology. 10 (2–3), pp. 1–39. <br/>Tamas, S. (2019). ‘Tricky Stories: Settler-Academic Reflections on Anti-Colonial Teaching’. Geo-humanities. 5 (2), pp. 376–385. <br/>Taylor, A. &amp; Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2019) The Common Worlds of Children and Animals. Oxon: Routledge.<br/>Vintimilla, C.D. (2014) Neolibral Fun and Happiness in Early Childhood Education. Canadian Association for Young Children. 39 (1), pp. 79 - 87.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,017
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,426
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0170,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,006
Communication savante0,0010,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,237
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,168 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)Même sujetPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismTravaux en français237 207