MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7043950405

Translating Benjamin's "Critique of Violence"

2022· other· en· W7043950405 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGoldsmiths (University of London) · 2022
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFraming (construction)Argument (complex analysis)PoliticsEvent (particle physics)JudaismNazism
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABOUT THE EVENT Marking the centenary of Walter Benjamin's immensely influential essay, Toward the Critique of Violence—edited by Peter Fenves and Julia Ng—presents readers with a new, fully annotated translation of a work that is widely recognized as a classic of modern political theory. The volume also includes framing essays by the editors and twenty-one notes and fragments by Benjamin, along with passages from all of the contemporaneous texts to which Benjamin’s essay refers. Readers thus encounter for the first time in English provocative arguments about law and violence advanced by Hermann Cohen, Kurt Hiller, Erich Unger, and Emil Lederer, as well selections from Georges Sorel's Reflections on Violence. The translators’ prefaces discuss the contexts in which these scholars developed their arguments as well as the role that their work played in the composition of Benjamin’s essay. With its challenging argument concerning violence, law, and justice—which addresses such topical matters as police violence, the death penalty, and the ambiguous force of religion—Benjamin's work is as important today as it was upon its publication in Weimar Germany a century ago. This roundtable with the editors and translators will explore the timeliness of Benjamin’s arguments as they are illuminated by the work of editing and translation. PARTICIPANTS Peter Fenves, the Joan and Serapta Professor of Literature at Northwestern University, is a professor of German, Comparative Literary Studies, and Jewish Studies. He is the author of several books, including The Messianic Reduction: Walter Benjamin and the Shape of Time (Stanford) and Late Kant: Toward another Law of the Earth (New York and London). Julia Ng is Senior Lecturer in Critical Theory and co-director of Goldsmiths' Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought, though on this occasion she is speaking in a personal capacity in solidarity with the ongoing campaign to boycott Goldsmiths and reject its management's efforts to push through redundancies and structuring across academic and professional staff. Lisa Marie Anderson is Professor and Chair of German at Hunter College, City University of New York. She is the author of German Expressionism and the Messianism of a Generation (Rodopi 2011), as well as the translator/editor of two books on Johann Georg Hamann with Northwestern University Press. Her articles have appeared in The Wilson Quarterly, The Goethe Yearbook, German Life & Letters, and a number of other venues. Her translations have appeared with Lexington Books and The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. Austin Harrington is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Leeds, UK. His recent publications include German Cosmopolitan Social Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar (Cambridge University Press, 2016) and Georg Simmel: Essays on Art and Aesthetics (University of Chicago Press, 2020). Dana Hollander is Associate Professor at the Department of Religious Studies at McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario), where she is also an associate member of the Department of Philosophy and a member of the MA Program in Cultural Studies & Critical Theory. Her research areas are twentieth-century French and German philosophy, modern Jewish thought, and German-Jewish studies. She is the author of Ethics Out of Law: Hermann Cohen on the “Neighbor” (University of Toronto Press, 2021) and Exemplarity and Chosenness. Rosenzweig and Derrida on the Nation of Philosophy (Stanford University Press, 2008) and the translator of Jacob Taubes, The Political Theology of Paul (Stanford University Press, 2004). Bruce Rosenstock is Professor of Religion at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His most recent monograph is Transfinite Life: Oskar Goldberg and the Vitalist Imagination (IUP, 2017). He is currently working on a book exploring the themes of kinship and incest in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament and the influence of these themes on the emergence of the African slave trade and anti-Black racism in the modern era. Alberto Toscano is professor of critical theory and codirector of the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought at Goldsmiths, University of London, and visiting faculty at the Digital Democracies Institute in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University. He is the author of Cartographies of the Absolute (2015, with Jeff Kinkle) and Fanaticism: On the Uses of an Idea (2nd ed., 2017) and the coeditor of The SAGE Handbook of Marxism (2021). He is a member of the editorial board of Historical Materialism and series editor of the Italian List for Seagull Books.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,128
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0480,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGoldsmiths (University of London)Travaux en français237 207