MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7044154585

Visions of the Present: Nostalgias in Twentieth-Century American Fiction and Film

2023· dissertation· en· W7044154585 sur OpenAlexafffund

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesDivision of Graduate EducationSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
Mots-clésVisionPerspective (graphical)NarrativePhotography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although generally understood to denote a wistful desire for the past, nostalgia may assume a variety of forms.This dissertation explores nostalgias (i.e., diverse nostalgic modes and expressions of nostalgia) in twentieth-century American fiction and film.Specifically, it interrogates the critical functions of nostalgia in F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby (1925), Elliott Nugent's The Great Gatsby (1949), Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita (1955), Stanley Kubrick's Lolita (1962), Raymond Chandler's The Long Goodbye (1953), and Robert Altman's The Long Goodbye (1973).Attending to narrative and formal expressions of nostalgia in these novels and films, as well as readers' and viewers' experiences of nostalgia in response to these works, Visions of the Present scrutinizes both the role of nostalgia in such works and how artists employ nostalgia to articulate various social critiques.Chapter one examines conflicted impulses toward the past and future in Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, clarifying how Fitzgerald engages contemporaneous debates by using nostalgia as a trope to satirize resistance to progress even as he uncovers a fundamental American paradox: efforts toward self-making are also often about trying to recover an irretrievable past.Chapter two considers the ways in which Nugent's The Great Gatsby expresses and nostalgically responds to different cultural anxieties of the 1940s.It illustrates how Nugent's film puts nostalgia to use in a national allegory that warns of repeating past mistakes.Chapter three addresses misreadings of nostalgia in Nabokov's Lolita by interrogating Nabokov's ironic employment of nostalgia in the novel.It identifies nostalgia as fundamental to Nabokov's censure of the commodification of childhood.Arguing that Nabokov's concept of aesthetic bliss conjoins Lolita's aesthetics and ethics, chapter three concludes that readers may experience aesthetic bliss by carefully observing the functions of nostalgia in Lolita.Chapter four analyzes the significance of subverting and perverting nostalgia in Kubrick's Lolita, revealing how the film condemns the sort of suburban pretense that potentially fuels multiple forms of discrimination.Chapter five details how Chandler uses the motif of nostalgia in The Long Goodbye to denounce mid-century American culture as inferior to his nostalgic view of nineteenth-century England.It attends to tensions between reflective and restorative nostalgia in the novel that expose Chandler's social critique as highly problematic.Chapter six investigates competing nostalgic drives in Altman's The Long Goodbye.It shows how the film questions nostalgia for the tough-guy figure of classic Hollywood crime genres to parody hypermasculinity and thereby challenge what it means to be a (male) hero in 1970s America.This chapter also demonstrates how Altman's complex treatment of nostalgia validates the male antihero embodied by the hard-boiled detective as a man of integrity, hence illuminating the film's simultaneously nostalgic and anti-nostalgic qualities.Visions of the Present thus elucidates how nostalgia is mobilized in numerous and unique ways within and across the novels and films under consideration.Explicating the ways these works often simultaneously elicit and reject nostalgia, this dissertation argues that nostalgia plays a centraland often overlooked-role in expressing artists' critiques of their own sociohistorical moments, their visions of the present.I could not have completed this dissertation without the assistance, dedication, and mentorship of many people.Foremost, I wish to extend my immense gratitude to my supervisor, Derek Nystrom, whose deeply engaged and thoughtful feedback has been invaluable to helping me develop my arguments and refine my work.I tremendously appreciate Derek's investment in this project and my success, his generosity of time, his patience with my stops and starts, his kindness, and his sense of humour.I am also grateful to Ned Schantz and Allan Hepburn, especially for their excellent input on an early version of chapter one that very much influenced how I approached subsequent chapters.It was a conversation with Ned from which the idea for this project germinated and for which I owe him a great deal.I am also indebted to Ned for encouraging me to think beyond nostalgic content, to contemplate nostalgic aesthetics.Allan challenged me to consider questions that had not occurred to me and to carefully reflect on my methodology.I am a better

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,057

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,020
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorTravaux en français237 207