Borrowed practices : renew or hold : examining the potential for the spreading of libraries of things in Mexico City through social practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Libraries of things, non-for-profit physical spaces where people borrow objects they would otherwise buy, have spread over Europe, the U.S., and Canada and have now emerged in Mexico City, where challenges to sustainability such as increased consumption levels and insufficient waste management abound. Collaborative economy initiatives like libraries of things are exposed as more sustainable alternatives to conventional patterns of satisfying human needs. Practices related to CE are not foreign to citizens in Mexico City as historical traditions of trade and barter and circulation of used objects have remained vibrant in convergence with monetization. Yet, the aforementioned practices have often been regarded as pertaining to lower class status. Nevertheless, collaborative economy platforms, while for-profit and often relying on digital technology, have recently begun to thrive in the city, becoming part of everyday practices in different strata of society and thus challenging culturally embedded notions of status. In this regard, research and discourse around transformative economies in the Global South is scarce, and in Mexico it is mainly focused on either the thriving for-profit platforms or the solidarity or social economy initiatives in response to pressing socio-economic justice concerns. This study provides an insight on the sector of the collaborative economy that is based on non-for-profit and face-to-face interactions. Three elements of social practice theory: material, skills & know-how and meaning, were used to preliminarily assess shaping factors in the spread of the practice of sharing objects in libraries of things in Mexico City. A localized overview of everyday practices and perceptions of libraries of things was obtained through interviews at a middle-class housing unit and supported by literature reviews and data collected with members of collaborative economy initiatives in the city. Results show that the practice of sharing objects is acknowledged and participation in physical platforms of the collaborative economy can potentially be embraced by members of different backgrounds within the socially heterogeneous middle-class sector in the city. However, the overall motivations to participate do not include elements sustainability or social justice. Nevertheless, classist prejudices of status and hygiene around used and recycled objects were found to be fading and actively transformed through trust in response to the economic crisis and greater presence of alternative ways of consumption. Barriers like mistrust in the government and lack of validation or support from the latter were identified along with needs to establish mechanisms for accountability and participation at community and citywide levels.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».