Can culture shape the identity of a sport? A case study on lifesaving sport - Surf Lifesaving Australia and Lifesaving/Sauvetage Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sport is an important marker of our country's culture and identity. Citizens within a country will cheer and support their sport teams if they are successful, or criticize and judge if they are doing poorly. The importance of culture within sport is an important indicator of a country's success or failure within international competitions; such as the Olympics and World Championships. However, can culture shape the identity of a sport within a country?\nLifesaving is a vital aspect of a country's swim program, as it focuses on reducing injury and death in, on, or around the water. Within Lifesaving, there has been a creation of a sport called Lifesaving Sport, which focuses on youth leadership, participation, and sport development. The creation of this sport became to fruition due to the focus on improving a lifesaver or lifeguard skills through simulated emergency response sporting activities.\nIn Australia, Lifesaving Sport is ranked as one of the top participation sports within the country with more than 10,000 competitors competing at their National Championships; the number of competitors is more than that of the Commonwealth Games. WIthin this country the sport has secured corporate sponsors, their major competitions are live on free-to-air television, they have partnerships with government sport agencies such as the Australian Sport Commission (ASC) and the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), the operations of the sport is being run by professional employees. In Canada, there is no accurate statistics on the participation rate within the sport as there have been no implementation of a statistical program to measure it, it is stipulated in the constitution of the sport's National Sport Organization (NSO) that only volunteers are allow to manage the sport. There is minimum media coverage, and Sport Canada, the Canadian government sport funding agency, does not recognize Lifesaving Sport as a sport.\nThe purpose of the research is to see if a framework can be created on the variables of identity and culture, and to significantly come up with a definable answer if culture can shape a sport identity to make it more popular or decrease its popularity. This research is on-going and shows an interesting parallel of the differences of the same sport within two different countries. Through preliminary research, the culture has been a main indicator as to why there are differences. The research is aim to focus on: How important is culture within sport and physical activity and to NSOs? Can we measure the correlation of culture and the identity of the sport? Can we use culture to shape a sport identity to make it more popular?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,035 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».