MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7045743259

THE BODY OF A FROG A Memoir on Searching for Ways to Love an Unconventional Self

2023· article· en· W7045743259 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCircumstantial evidenceSubject (documents)HeadlineGloomRelation (database)Subconscious
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This project started as a prose poem, then became a flash essay, and is now an entire thesis. The prose poem, titled “An Unexpected Dialogue,” explored my thoughts and expectations on having my own biological child with my boyfriend, AJ. I’d never wanted to have my own child before writing that poem, even before meeting and spending a year with AJ, but when I felt that inkling of desire, the only way I knew I could begin to grapple with it was to write. I turned the poem into a flash essay with more scenes and fragmented thoughts on the idea of having my own kid one day, and by the end of it, I was contemplating the idea of my past, particularly the decisions I made regarding transitioning. Had the drugs I’ve been giving my body since 2017 ruined my chances at parenthood? I thought even deeper, considering my body as a whole and my relationship with it. I began to think of what it was before my transition, before female puberty even, and what it is now. I began to consider how this relation fluctuated and how it continues to do so, even to this day. Therefore, my thesis does just that– it considers my relationship with my own body and how I hold bodily autonomy over it. The body serves as a separate entity from the self, and fragments of their interaction, along with that of others, including puberty, society, boys, doctors, etc., are examined under a microscope. This thesis’s form was loosely based on Maggie Nelson’s Bluets. In her novella, Nelson has the same fragmented structure which focuses on her personal experiences in a relationship, but she also utilizes hints of research. Bluets teeters back and forth between informational and personal, and we skip around in time throughout. This thesis also has multiple layers of formatting. First, there is a main metaphor used throughout, which is that of the Mutable Rainfrog. This frog can change its body on a whim in order to ward off predators, so my thesis uses this frog as an avenue to consider my own body and how it changes to ward off its strongest predator: myself. After considering the frog, each section begins with a key scene, which are used to guide the reader through this selected time of my life chronologically; “To Hate a Smooth Body” begins with a scene of myself in third grade, when I found the first flaw with my body, “To Achieve Textured Skin (or Bodily Autonomy)” begins with my first attempt to correct flaws I saw amongst my body, “An Unsuccessful Texturing” begins with that first moment of doubt after taking more extreme measures to gain bodily autonomy, “Sex as Bodily Autonomy” begins with the night I lost my virginity, and the subsequent “relationship” that followed, and finally, “The Constant Predator” begins with a sexual escapade between my boyfriend’s body and my own. Within these sections, time skips around, and research is incorporated to make connections between my own experiences and body and grander, more societal, ideas, until finally, the thesis ends on a scene of observation– my boyfriend shows me a picture of myself, of my body, all dressed up for a wedding. He points out what he likes about the picture and about my body, and I agree, even if not whole-heartedly. This not-entirely-happy ending was very purposeful, and very vital to what I strive to achieve in Creative Nonfiction as a genre. The purpose of my writing is to explore the real and uncensored world. Even in my Letter of Intent for MSU, Mankato, I stated that my writing “explore[s] the world in all of its hidden truth via my controversial being and experiences because of it.” While enrolled in this Creative Writing program, I’ve had over seven essays and prose poems published, all of which speak towards this idea of exploring hidden truths as well. This thesis, though, I feel is the pinnacle of all those pieces. This thesis explores hidden truths related to society and me, such as hidden truths on the plastic surgery industry, on medical affirmation transgender care procedures, on relationships, on birth control, periods, and a multitude of others. Some of these truths are researched, and others are personal truths. This thesis is an expansion and growth of my writing abilities, all while still exploring a multitude of hidden truths that all revolve around one thing: the body. I chose to write about the body because everyone has one, but each of our bodies are still unique to us. My body had, and still has, so many stories to tell, and I know everyone else’s do too. I wanted this thesis to inspire others to consider their own bodies and the stories they hold, whether they be visible or not, good or bad. In her memoir Body Geographic, Barrie Jean Borich explores her own body through the eyes of experiences, family, and her partner. Borich (116) describes “a body that doesn’t fit into easy categories” as “an idea that’s harder to see… an identity that has obscure borders and is neither one thing nor another.” Additionally, Alison Bechdel (169) explores her sexuality and puberty in the graphic memoir Fun Home, where she even avoids writing the word menstruating; “I encoded the word menstruating according to the practice I’d learned in algebra of denoting complex or unknown quantities with letters.” Bodies hold stories, and no matter how unconventional or brutally honest they may be, our stories are important to tell.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,710
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207