MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7045809919

CARE PERCEPTIONS OF REFUGEES ACCESSING SERVICES AT THE REACH CLINIC AND THEIR EXPERIENCES TRANSITIONING TO MAINSTREAM HEALTHCARE AFTER ONE YEAR

2021· dissertation· en· W7045809919 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThematic analysisRefugeeMainstreamDescriptive statisticsHealth carePerceptionGovernment (linguistics)Qualitative researchMultivariate analysis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Globally, the health needs and status of refugees are still poorly understood post-migration. Responding to the increasing numbers of refugees in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, the Refugee Engagement and Community Health (REACH) clinic was established to optimize health-care for refugees. Using a multi-disciplinary approach, the clinic provides primary, specialized, and urgent care needs within the first year of re-settlement before supporting the transition to a family physician. Therefore it is important to determine how the clinic is impacting the health of its service users. The purpose of this mixed-methods convergent parallel design was to understand how refugees’ perceptions of care and access influence their perceived health status while attending the clinic and their transition experiences to a family physician within the community. \nMethod: Using a cross-sectional design, data collection took place from May 2018 to April 2019. Seventy-five Government Assisted Refugees (GARs) completed a survey questionnaire at the time of transition. Questions included demographic characteristics, accessibility of care, perception of the visit with the provider, and health status. Following descriptive statistics of the sample, regression analysis measured the relationship between “perceived health status at one year” and several key independent variables as determined by multivariate analysis. At the same time, interviews conducted with a subset of 16 participants provided a deeper understanding of refugees’ perceptions of care and their transition experiences. Thematic analysis was done. \nResults: Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between perceived health status and frequency of visits (p=0.042) and “doctors’ advice” (p=0.039). Analysis of the qualitative interviews corroborated survey findings that services offered at the clinic were appropriate and tailored to refugees’ needs. Though some participants spoke of barriers related to transportation and culture, some prominent enablers included their ability to communicate and understand information through interpreters, access to child and maternity services, trusting the clinic environment, clinic partnerships, and appropriate patient-physician interactions. At transition, refugees felt unprepared to engage with their new physicians citing lack of awareness and health literacy issues. Once transitioned, language and cultural discordance, lack of understanding of the fee-for-service delivery model, and trust were some of the challenges affecting their abilities to access care. This fostered dependency in some participants and resilience in others. \nConclusion: Findings indicated that GARs perceived health status and perceptions were highly influenced by their expectations of health-care delivery. Findings also underscore the importance and the effectiveness of the existing comprehensive, integrated service delivery model that is both linguistic and culturally competent and built on strong partnerships between the REACH Clinic, settlement agencies, and other community partners. On the other hand, there is a need for a more robust transition component within this integrated service delivery model; however, without new resources and up-stream funding to ensure a successful transition, poor health seeking behaviours may develop post transitioned. Providing appropriate support to mainstream physicians could also be emphasized. This study has contributed to affirm the current provision of clinic services and highlighted the urgent need for additional training, resources and policies guidelines to help reduce barriers faced by refugees and better address the transition to mainstream care. A further study could be conducted to gain more insight into how the existing barriers such as the fee-for-service model can be addressed to better accommodate refugees and to continue improving the transition of refugees as they move from refugee-specific clinics to the mainstream health care system.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,969
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207