Columbia River northern pike: Investigating the ecology of British Columbia's new apex invasive freshwater predator
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Northern pike (Esox lucius) is a widely distributed freshwater fish in the northern hemisphere, holding both recreational and commercial value in many countries including Canada. Pike are apex predators and are well regarded as a sport fish due to their size and voraciousness, leading to a long history of introductions outside their native range in North America. Invasive pike populations can impose significant top-down pressure on native fish community structure through predation and competition for resources, and have been linked with significant reductions of a variety of native species. Pike have recently invaded the Columbia River in British Columbia downstream of the Hugh L. Keenleyside Dam, threatening important sport fisheries, local ecosystems, and Species at Risk recovery work currently being conducted in the Columbia and its tributaries. In response to the invasion, the province implemented a pike suppression program, yet several questions remain regarding the ecology and behaviour of the recently colonized population. This research aimed to answer these questions and aid in the development of a long term management strategy for the Columbia River. Four years of data collected through the suppression program were analyzed to investigate the potential risk the invasion poses to native fish communities in B.C., the status of pike in the B.C. Columbia River, and the efficacy and impacts of current efforts. A total of 352 northern pike were captured through the suppression program by gill-netting (n=323) and angler incentives (n=29), ranging in length from 260 mm to 1050 mm. Cleithra age estimates indicate pike from within this population are achieving sizes in excess of 1 m in five to six years, and are in better than average body condition (relative weight Wr used) when compared to other North American populations. A total of 584, 659, 407, and 676 gill-net hours were set in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 respectively, and an overall reduction in pike catch per unit effort (CPUE) was observed from the initial year (0.19 pike/hr) to the final year (0.05 pike/hr). This suggests gill-netting has been effective at reducing the number of adult pike in B.C. and should be conducted annually. The capture of several juvenile pike (n = 14) near Castlegar in 2017 indicates spawning is occurring in B.C. and future years of suppression should include controlling the juvenile cohort. Salmonids, particularly whitefish spp., appear to be at the greatest risk from pike predation making up approximately 50% of pike diet overall. Acoustic tracking of pike indicated the majority of individuals from within this population remain relatively sedentary, yet one individual migrated in excess of 100 km between B.C. and Washington. Microchemical analysis of pike otoliths revealed significant differences in ratios of Sr and Ba to Ca between pike caught in the Columbia and Pend d’Oreille Rivers, and that a small portion of the current Columbia population in B.C. appears to have originated in the Pend d’Oreille River. Fluctuations in otolith elemental Mg concentrations also appear to provide information that can be used to estimate the age of northern pike and potentially other esocid species. Lastly, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling as a tool to monitor the presence and spread of northern pike in B.C. was explored with minimal success; the protocol used and results obtained are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».