Development of a novel methodology for the determination of the total solar energy transmittance of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic window technologies using outdoor measurements
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The urgent need to combat global warming and transition towards sustainable energy sources has focused attention on the building sector, a major contributor to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. To achieve net-zero energy building performance, a comprehensive approach is essential, involving energy conservation measures, enhanced building systems efficiency, and integrating on-site renewable energy generation. Within this context, the integration of photovoltaic window technologies become essential for the generation of renewable electricity and reduction of solar heat gains which impacts building heating, cooling, and electric lighting loads as well as visual and thermal comfort. \n The aim of this thesis is to introduce the theoretical background of a novel experimental methodology for the determination of total solar energy transmittance (TSET) of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) windows using outdoor measurements. Existing studies and standards dictate the use of indoor test facilities consisting primarily of a hot box calorimeter where the window is mounted and characterized under a steady state solar simulator. The calorimetric (thermal) methods require steady state conditions that have been proven challenging to achieve for windows that incorporate advanced shading devices or photovoltaic cells, potentially resulting to significant measurement errors of the TSET. Also, these studies rarely characterize the angular dependency of TSET. \nTo overcome these challenges, a novel experimental methodology is proposed to measure TSET using optical measurements under outdoor conditions. The experimental setup uses pyranometers (for solar transmittance measurements), pyrheliometer (for direct incident measurements), several Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD) sensors and infrared cameras (for surface temperature measurements), allowing the determination of TSET (and its angular dependency) based on a series of instantaneous outdoor measurements under sunny conditions that could result to reliable and repeatable TSET values. For the case of BIPV windows, a load at maximum power point (MPP) is connected to the window, allowing the maximum fraction of the absorbed solar energy to be converted into electricity. Finally, a new approach is proposed for the conversion of measured TSET to TSET under standard conditions, using a reference window of known TSET. \nThe unique aspects of the proposed TSET methodology are: i) the use of optical measurements ii) performed under transient outdoor test conditions. Current standard TSET calorimetric tests use thermal measurements that require long window conditioning under steady state conditions. The new methodology is also able to perform TSET measurements under a range of solar angle of incidence (i.e., 0 to 60 degrees), including normal TSET. The limitation of the proposed methodology is that it is not applicable to products with angular selective properties (e.g., microshade film). While it is developed for BIPV windows, and can be applied for TSET determination of coated, reflective, and electrochromic windows, under outdoor test conditions. \nIn summary, a novel experimental methodology is proposed for the determination of the total solar energy transmittance of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic windows using outdoor measurements. The proposed methodology aims to provide a framework to quick, accurate, consistent, and repeatable approach to TSET testing that can potentially be standardized for BIPV windows and other advanced window technologies. The proposed methodology intends to support the advancement of sustainable building practices, enhance energy efficiency, and foster the integration of renewable energy technologies into building design and construction, paving the way for a more sustainable built environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».