Cultural Revitalization and Coming Home to Culture in the Anishinaabe context
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This undergraduate honours thesis discusses the Anishinaabe context of cultural revitalization, specifically with the Chippewas of Nawash or Neyaashiinigmiing. This work is extremely important as we, in Canada, are now in a time of reconciliation. We, as Indigenous peoples, must reconcile not only with Canada but with ourselves. Coming home to culture means reconciling with ourselves and the shared histories of our communities. Likewise, Indigenous resurgence is important for upholding and ensuring the strength of our communities. It is time for healing and the only way to truly heal our communities is to heal ourselves and our kin. Anishinaabe communities and specifically the Chippewas of Nawash hold an extremely important place in my heart as they have given me the teachings and the support to engage and connect with community. Through visiting, sharing meals and spending time, I have appreciated being a part of this community. Anishinaabe communities are so rich, vibrant, and resilient as they have faced adversity and come out the other side. I am grateful to be a part of the Chippewas of Nawash community and am proud to call it my home. \n \nI discuss ‘coming home’ to culture as a central concept in my research. Coming home in this context means healing, healing spiritually, mentally, and physically. Coming home can mean a variety of things, for some, it is coming home to their community or territory, for others, it is coming home to ceremony, coming home to cultural teachings, or coming to sobriety. For each person, it is coming home to themselves in whatever way provides healing. There is limited research on coming home to culture, therefore, my work is a minor piece of what can be accomplished. My work is informed by a literature review and scoping review. I have analyzed sources from various Indigenous and non-Indigenous authors. I have tried to prioritize Anishinaabe-centric literature, however, did not discount various other accounts and perspectives across North America, Turtle Island. Throughout the literature, I found there were reoccurring themes that arose and from this found five keywords: resurgence, revitalization, ceremony, culture, and home. These keywords were vital to understanding coming home and cultural revitalization. \n \nI have been under the guidance of my Elder Miptoon Chegahno; he has acted as a Mishomis or grandfather to me, guiding me in a good way. He has been a teacher to me and informed much of this work. Miptoon has accepted me into the community and taken me on as a student. He has never failed to show me the importance of spending time, drinking tea, and going for walks to hear the birds. The teachings I am carrying forward create the idea of what it means to come home. I am grateful to be carrying his clan and the teachings that come with that. His teachings are central to this work and the conclusions I have drawn.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,038 | 0,035 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».