The Descendants of Giants: In Search of Exemplary Specimens of At Risk Trees in Southern Ontario's Oak Ridges Moraine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Prior to widespread settlement by Europeans in the early to mid 19th century, southern Ontario (i.e., the region south of Lake Simcoe) was blanketed by dense mixed deciduous forests that had been shaping, and were being shaped by, the landscape for over 10,000 years. Today, over 95% of these once expansive forests have been cleared for agriculture and other forms of development (see Figures 1 and 2) (Berger, 2008; McLachlan and Bazely, 2003). This extensive clearance and land use alteration has imperiled the continued existence of many of southern Ontario's native tree species. \n \nCompounding this predicament has been a long history of over-harvesting the fittest trees in the forest, as well as the more recent introduction and spread of alien and native invasive species and diseases. There are no longer any old growth forests of significance left in southern Ontario. Over 95% of remnant Carolinian forest patches are less than 10 hectares in area and most are over 1.5 km apart (McLachlan and Bazely, 2003). The largest remaining stand of Carolinian forest in Canada is in Rondeau Provincial Park and is a mere 11 km2 (Tanentzap et al., 2011). Most remaining patches of Carolinian are tiny, scattered, and situated on marginal lands with poor soils that are ill-suited to agriculture (and thus ill-suited to supporting vibrant, diverse forests). As most of the healthiest and genetically superior specimens of rare southern Ontario trees were harvested for wood in centuries past, the genetic stock that remains in the region's patchwork of forests tends to be anything but robust (Schaberg et al., 2008). \n \nNot only are southern Ontario's Carolinian forests the most biologically diverse forests in all of Canada, but they are also the most threatened (Tanentzap et al., 2011). The Carolinian biome supports over half of Canada's total biodiversity, and over half of its tree species (roughly 100 tree species of the 180 in the country) (Feagan, 2013; Tree Canada, 2013). It is home to roughly 165 species officially recognized as vulnerable, of special concern, threatened, or endangered, 12 of which are trees (OMNR, 2011). In addition to these recognized species, there are also over 500 species considered to be rare in Canada's Carolinian forest region (CCC, n.d.). The Carolinian occupies roughly 0.25% of Canada's land area yet is home to over 25% of the country's population (McLachlan and Bazely, 2003; Tanentzap et al., 2011). The fact that such a densely populated and developed area also hosts such a rich array of native biodiversity poses many unique and formidable conservation challenges. \n \nThe purpose of this research was to survey a series of five protected areas in the western Oak Ridges Moraine region of southern Ontario, locate exemplary specimens of rare native trees, catalogue their exact location, write about my experiences, and make all of the information and resources I gather available to the general public.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».