Determined to Work? Review of Wolfgang Lehmann, Choosing to Labour
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How do high school students in Canada and Germany decide what kind of work they want to do after graduation?Wolfgang Lehmann, a professor of sociology at the University of Western Ontario, asked over 100 students in Edmonton and Bremen and found some surprising results.This is not an oral history, but rather a qualitative study addressed primarily to Canadian educational policy makers and school administrators.Nevertheless, oral historians can learn from the ways in which social scientists analyze and interpret qualitative data such as interviews.In the first part of his book, Lehmann describes his research results.Although statistics reveal that social status determines to a large degree whether students choose to apprentice in a trade or go on to university, the young men and women describe their choices as their own.Despite very different school systems in Germany and Canada, there are no significant differences in this gap between reality and perception.Lehmann is particularly interested in the students who decided to learn a trade.While Germany's apprenticeship system has a long history and is deeply integrated in the school system and labour market, Canada has no overarching system.Thus, he takes Alberta's Registered Apprenticeship Program as a case study.The crucial question about apprenticeship systems is whether apprenticeships help students achieve the best education or whether they channel working-class children into working-class jobs, thus perpetuating class structures and reproducing social inequality.Research, including Lehmann's own, shows that the latter is the case, and that there is little room for students' actual agency.This is particularly problematic for female students, because they make their decisions within deeply gendered familial and social circumstances.Although girls and women have become more successful in education, their virtual absence from trades -and the lack of trades (outside of hairdressing) for them -leave female students not going on to higher education with a bleak future.Yet, even young women planning to go on to college or university plan their careers with considerations about future family plans in mind that put them into the traditional role of stay-at-home mom.Young men's silence about family in discussing their careers similarly points to gendered expectations of their future wives to stay at home with their future children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».