MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7046862485

Economic Analyses of Livestock Marketing and Production in China

2023· dissertation· en· W7046862485 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProduction (economics)Willingness to payQuality (philosophy)CredenceLivestockChinaProduct (mathematics)Discrete choiceSurvey data collectionPanel data
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This dissertation comprises three interrelated essays on livestock marketing and production in China. In the first essay, the main objective was to propose and implement a procedure to estimate price’s budgetary and signaling effects on demand for goods in discrete choice experiments. A structural modeling procedure was developed and implemented to identify the double impact of price on utility and to guide the empirical approach. The application used data from an online survey of 622 Chinese consumers conducted in 2021. In addition to a choice experiment using beef brisket, the survey included questions about consumers’ perceived quality of the brisket. This study utilized a mixed logit model to explore consumers’ choice decisions and employed a panel linear regression model to estimate the price-quality relationship. Results show a positive and statistically significant effect of price on perceived product quality, suggesting that Chinese consumers use price as an indicator of quality, which might be related to uncertainty regarding beef brisket quality and distrust of the information presented on labels. However, this study found that the budgetary effect is greater than the signaling effect. Moreover, Chinese consumers are willing to pay premiums for overall quality improvements. These willingness to pay values would be smaller if consumers did not use price as a signal for quality. The second essay examined Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for credence attributes of beef from the domestic market and beef from other large exporting countries. Three beef cuts were considered: steak, brisket, and tongue. Data was collected from an online survey incorporating choice experiments of 2,016 consumers from China in 2021. In the choice scenarios, each respondent was presented with three beef alternatives that differed in price, country of origin, food safety, and production certifications, and also included a “no purchase” option. Chinese consumers’ beef selections in the choice experiments were analyzed using a mixed logit model in willingness space. Results indicate the type of cut does not influence Chinese consumers’ evaluation of country of origin and credence attributes. Moreover, results show that Chinese consumers strongly prefer and are willing to pay more for domestic beef than imported beef products. Beef from New Zealand had the highest willingness to pay value among all the exporting countries included in the study, followed by Argentina, Australia, Canada, Uruguay, Brazil, and the United States. Also, enhanced food safety and Organic and Green Food certifications had positive willingness to pay values. Overall, the findings of this study offer evidence that Chinese consumers prefer safe and quality-assured beef products. The third and final essay examined the impacts of windfall income from picking and trading caterpillar fungus on pastoral households’ livestock production activities. Data was collected from a pastoral household survey (n=503) conducted in 2016 and 2017 in five Tibetan Autonomous Prefectures in China. This study employed propensity score matching procedures with the first nearest neighbor matching method to estimate the effect of participation in harvesting and trading the caterpillar fungus. The estimated results show that pastoral households with income from caterpillar fungus activities tend to maintain a smaller herd size, sell fewer animals for profit, slaughter more livestock for family consumption, and experience fewer livestock deaths compared to traditional pastoral households without caterpillar fungus income. Consequently, the new income source also decreases the grazing intensity. Moreover, the findings of this study provide evidence for promoting a more diversified and sustainable livelihood portfolio to decrease traditional pastoral households’ dependence on grasslands.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,826
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle