El-Hosh en Qurta: de oudste Egyptische kunst op het spoor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since 1998, the Royal Museums of Art and History in Brussels have been conducting rock art research at two different locations in Upper Egypt: el-Hosh and Qurta. The rock art of the former location, besides including a large amount of ‘classical’ Predynastic images (4th millennium BC), is mainly characterized by strange curvilinear designs, which are often associated with other abstract and figurative motifs. Based on ethnographic parallels, little doubt remains that many of these designs represent fishtraps. Aspects of patination and weathering, and the fact that these images are often superimposed by Predynastic rock art, hint at an advanced age. The AMS-dating of organic material trapped in the rock varnish covering the drawings confirms this and yields a minimal date of 5900-5300 BC. The rock art itself may be several millennia older. It was probably done by small groups of hunter-gatherers that dwelled in the Nile Valley and the adjacent deserts. Possibly they congregated at el-Hosh on a seasonal basis, at the time of the inundation, to perform fishing activities, which may have been accompanied by ceremonies and rituals, including the creation of rock art. In 2004, a locality with a completely different type of rock art was found at el-Hosh. This rock art is characterized by images of bovids, executed in a very naturalistic style and closely comparable to European Ice Age art. Similar images had already been discovered in the area in the 1960s by a Canadian archaeological mission. The latter images, however, were never properly studied and published, and remained largely unknown to the scientific community. They were relocated by us in 2005 near the modern village of Qurta. Since then, about 185 individual images have been identified, most of which represent wild animals. Aurochs are predominant, but hippopotami, gazelle, hartebeest, birds and fish are also present. Moreover, there are also several highly stylized human figures with pronounced buttocks. On the basis of the intrinsic characteristics of the rock art (subject matter, technique and style), its patination and degree of weathering, as well as the archaeological and geomorphological context, an attribution to the Late Palaeolithic Period has been proposed. This has been confirmed by the dating of windblown sediments that covered some of the rock art panels. Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL), it has been determined that these sediments were deposited about 10,000 to 15,000 years ago, thus confirming the Late Palaeolithic age of the rock art. This makes the Qurta petroglyphs the oldest found so far not only in Egypt, but in the whole of North Africa.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,046 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».