Evaluating the role of movement behaviour and habitat familiarity on translocated grizzly bear success using an agent-based modelling approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In North America, the grizzly bear (Ursus arcos) is one of many species increasingly threatened by the consequences of human-wildlife conflict, with human-bear encounters on the rise due to increased human activity near or in bear habitat. As a result, a growing number of bears are subjected to management measures such as translocations in which animals are moved to areas with lower risk of human conflict, although these measures are not always successful. Previous research has attempted to understand factors associated with translocation success, but new methods are needed to address the continuous and complex nature of issues related to how animals move and learn about their surroundings as well as how they adapt to novel environments. The objective of my MSc thesis is to develop and employ a novel agent-based computer simulation model to analyze how grizzly bears learn and respond following a translocation event. This modelling effort attempts to capture how bears make decisions based on multiple factors, and represent how grizzly bears interact with their environment and make movement decisions based on learned behaviours. First, an agent-based movement model was developed for female grizzly bears using GPS-location data for bears within a region in west-central Alberta, Canada. The model, which incorporates multi-scale decision-making and machine learning, generated movement patterns similar to those observed in radio-collared females in the study area. Home range sizes and movement metrics produced by the model were consistent with those observed in female grizzly bears in the area. The model was then used to simulate translocation events in which bears with varying “exploration” propensities were translocated to habitats with familiar or novel landscape characteristics. In general, bears translocated to habitats with similar landscape features to their original habitat were more likely to use high-quality habitat than bears moved to areas with very different landscape features. However, while increased exploration led to greater use of high-quality habitat in the long run, exploratory behaviour was found to be mostly detrimental during the first years following a translocation, the period considered critical for translocation success. Model results were found to be scale-dependent with results varying both in time and space, highlighting the need for a multi-scale approach to animal movement studies. The findings presented here also emphasize the need to account for behavioural traits of wildlife and habitat characteristics of the capture and release sites when selecting suitable translocation locations. This work highlights the potential for agent-based modelling as a tool to study animal movement as a continuous and complex process and evaluate conservation policies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».