MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7047263393

Feathered roots and migratory routes: Latin American immigrants and birds

2015· dissertation· en· W7047263393 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2015
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePlace Attachment and Urban Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPopulationCircumstantial evidenceImmigrationWork (physics)Filter (signal processing)Government (linguistics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In our current age, which some call the Anthropocene, humans experience the combined effects of accelerated human mobility and ecological changes. These changes may affect people’s well-being, including their emotional and psychological connections to place and biodiversity. Birds are outstanding among organisms for the degree to which they emotionally evoke associations with places, and for immigrants birds can represent proxies of connection to several places. In this work, immigrants’ sense-of-place is considered to have attachments to birds in both roots-and-routes, where “roots” symbolize places of origin and “routes” represent new places where immigrants settle. By conceptualizing place and nature together, therefore, this work adds complex social dimensions, such as place attachment and identity, to the study of human-biodiversity relationships in the Anthropocene.
\nThe overall purpose of this work is to understand the intersection between human mobility, place and biodiversity in the Anthropocene, and how birds can help people adapt to change. To examine the role birds play in sense-of-place, I interviewed 26 recent immigrants with their roots in eight countries in Latin America and their routes in Canada and the United States of America. Using ethnographic interviews and different analytical tools (e.g., mindmaps and culturegram-timelines), I collated information about bird species that were significant to the participants, along with their meanings, including social and ecological factors that participants associated with these relationships. To deepen my understanding of social factors, I investigated the dynamic trajectory of participants’ relationships with birds through their life-stages, considering immigration as an integrated stage alongside childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Finally, to communicate my positionality in this work, I conducted an autoethnography to document memories where birds evoked events, places and identities, and how these memories comprise units of a researchable personal biocultural memory. Within personal people-biodiversity-place connections, biocultural memory is proposed to bridge the gap between self, culture and nature. 
\nA bird constellation of some 150 species in Latin America and 70 species in Canada and the U.S.A. represented for participants a roadmap between roots-and-routes, together with another 19 “accompanying” or shared birds. Additionally, several “key” birds were critical in helping participants adapt to their new place. These key and accompanying species, indeed, signified points of reference in the process of “recalibration” of participants’ sense-of-place. This recalibration process was based upon a degree of bird familiarity ranging from the recognition of birds participants knew from their roots to the admiration of completely “new” species in their routes. Key species represented either taxonomic equivalents (birds similar in appearance) or ecological equivalents (birds with similar habitat or behaviour). Within this range of familiarity, people relocate the geographical place experience of where they are. By recognizing species, whether familiar or unfamiliar, people recalibrate their geographical experiences. When participants recognized species that were particularly meaningful to their cultural background or professional achievements, they gained self-realization and continuity of their identity. Importantly for the achievement of place- and identity-recalibration, the communication and sharing of stories and experiences was paramount. Specifically, this “socialization” with birds was reported as the most important factor fostering adaptation in the new place. Although it took varied forms, socialization was the main engine generating meaningful relationships with birds through all participants’ life-stages. During childhood, for example, socialization was achieved via childhood play in nature, whereas in early adulthood it was achieved through social networks with peers and friends. These people-bird-place interactions create living memories that drive a dynamic biocultural memory and identity. 
\nThis study of immigrant-bird relationships provides several important insights for thinking about and engaging with novelty in the Anthropocene. These insights reveal the necessity to reconceptualize ecosystems together with societies as novel socio-ecosystems and to rethink humans’ place within them. Analyzing this scenario, I direct responsibility to scientists communicating and applying research to confront ecological and social sustainability challenges. Confronting these challenges demands the creation of effective politics of conviviality between humans and nonhumans from different places. More specifically, considering the capacity of people to connect with birds, I provide recommendations to increase newcomers’ participation in bird-related activities and to help foster integration of immigrants and nature in our increasingly multicultural societies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,475
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,789

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetPlace Attachment and Urban StudiesTravaux en français237 207