Good building practice guidelines for healthy and sustainable First Nations housing in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The current state of First Nations housing in Canada is, in general, considered to be in poor condition, with a high portion of homes in need of major repairs. First Nations communities are facing inadequate and overcrowded living conditions which have been associated with increased health risks. Currently, there are no standardized methods, or accepted protocols for completing housing condition assessments in First Nations communities. Understanding the specific housing conditions and the associated health and safety risks is essential to developing effective strategies to improve the health, safety, durability and sustainability of the housing stock. In this thesis, a process for assessing housing conditions in a First Nations community is presented. Using a case study method, which includes on-site building condition assessments, inspections for visible mould, and mould air sampling of 159 homes at Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation in Southern Manitoba, as well as an occupant survey of 133 heads of household, 72 common housing deficiencies were identified and linked to 12 health and safety hazards that are associated with each of these deficiencies. This research study, which led to the development of a Good Building Practice (GBP) guide, fills a critical void in the current research by providing a link between specific housing conditions and deficiencies present. Understanding how housing conditions affect the health and safety of the occupants can be a powerful tool for determining which housing repairs are critical and for establishing a timeframe for the implementation of repairs and upgrades. The significance of this study is that it provides First Nations housing authorities with a tool to identify housing deficiencies that are common in their communities, allowing these authorities to allocate appropriate funding to address the most critical safety items first, and plan capital funding to schedule less urgent repairs. The GBP guidelines provide general recommendations for remediating each deficiency using specific objective-based goals including improved health, safety, durability, and functionality. These guidelines can also be used by housing designers as a tool to better understand some of the unique conditions and deficiencies present in First Nations housing so that they can proactively design systems that will address these common deficiencies before they occur.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».