Functional modeling techniques for high-dimensional data with complex structures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent technological advancements have increased the structural complexity of recorded data across various fields of research. Terms such as high-dimensional and Big Data have become commonplace among statisticians and data scientists. Analyzing such data requires specialized techniques tailored to the specific application. This thesis focuses on studying high-dimensional data using techniques from Functional Data Analysis (FDA). The thesis is structured as a compilation of three independent research articles, each presented in a separate chapter, that nonetheless share the goal of enhancing a particular functional regression model. Chapter 2 introduces our first contribution, stringing via Manifold Learning, ML-stringing for short. Our proposal is framed within a wider class of methods that map high-dimensional observations to the infinite space of functions, allowing the use of FDA. Stringing handles any high-dimensional data vector as scrambled realizations of an unknown stochastic process. Its essential feature is a rearrangement of the observed values. Originally, stringing is based on Unidimensional Scaling (UDS), an unsupervised technique that linearly reduces the dimension of the data vectors by preserving distances. Motivated by the linear nature of UDS, we aim to recover more complex relationships between covariates using Manifold Learning. The chapter includes simulation studies showing that ML-stringing achieves higher-quality orderings than UDS-stringing, improving the data’s functional representation. In the context of scalar-on-function regression, ML-stringing also leads to improvements in the estimated model. The chapter also presents an application to a colon cancer study that deals with high-dimensional gene expression arrays. Chapter 3 addresses the scalar-on-function regression problem using functional partial least squares (FPLS), focusing on functional data defined over complex domains that may have multiple dimensions and non-Euclidean structures. Here we introduce our second contribution, a penalized FPLS approach based on a Rank-1 approximation of the empirical sample covariance matrix between the response and the predictor; R1-FPLS for short. When the domain has a manifold topology, R1- FPLS solves the scalar-on-function regression through Finite Element Analysis, which provides interesting sparsity properties that make the algorithm computationally efficient even in the context of large datasets. The chapter includes simulation studies that compare the performance of the proposed R1-FPLS with other FPLS approaches from the literature, using functional data defined over one-dimensional and two-dimensional planar domains. We also apply our method to brain connectivity maps obtained from task-based functional Magnetic Resonance Images. In this case, the brain is viewed as a three-dimensional domain with a non-Euclidean structure. Our results show that using R1-FPLS to discriminate between schizophrenics and healthy patients based on the connectivity maps outperforms other recently proposed approaches. Chapter 4 introduces our third contribution; a novel penalized Function-on- Function Partial Least-Squares (pFFPLS) that solves the function-on-function linear regression problem. pFFPLS introduces an appropriate finite-dimensional functional space with an associated set of bases on which to represent the data and controls smoothness with a roughness penalty operator. Penalizing the FPLS weights imposes smoothness on the resulting coefficient function, improving its interpretability. The chapter compares pFFPLS with the non-penalized counterpart FFPLS. Through a simulation study, it is shown that pFFPLS provides a higher accuracy when predicting the response and the true coefficient function from which the data were generated. The chapter also includes two case studies involving two well-known datasets from the FDA literature. In the first application, we predict log precipitation curves from the yearly temperature profiles recorded in 35 weather stations in Canada. In the second one, we predict the hip angle profiles during a gait cycle of children from their corresponding knee angle profiles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».