Höftledsdysplasi och armbågsledsartros hos labrador retriever med känt radiologiskt status av höftleder och armbågar : en tredje uppföljande studie
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Joint-related diseases including hip dysplasia (HD) and elbow arthritis (ED) can in advance cases lead to that the dog has to be put down, and these diseases are also the cause to expensive veterinary treatments of many large breeds, including Labrador Retrievers. The aim of this study was to make a follow-up study on the 271 Labradors, who previously participated in a study on the effect of nutrition and exercise on hip and elbow status in a birth cohort born year 2000. That study investigated the relationship between nutrition, exercise, and HD and ED. A follow up study on the same dogs at 5-6 years of age investigated the clinical effects of the radiological hip and elbow status at 1 years of age and if was effected by body condition score. This study took place in 2011-2012 and 187 Labrador retrievers participated. The dogs were now between 11-12 years old. \n \nThis follow-up was like the two previous studies, based on a survey by a combined mail and telephone interviews with a response rate of 68% (187/271). The questionnaire contained 13 questions regarding demographic data, disease and health. The HD and ED status at one year of age were already available from the Swedish Kennel Club registers. \nThis study showed: \n \nthat 86 dogs had died since the study started in 2000 and of these 6% (19/292) dogs died as a result of joint or bone-related disease. \n \nthat even though the study included many dogs with confirmed severe dysplasia in one or both hips and elbows at the age of 10-11 years of age, relatively few dogs (n=18) had died due to clinical symptoms of these diseases. \nSignificantly more dogs (n=30) were put down due different forms of cancers. \n \nthat at the age of 5-6 years many dogs had clinical problems that may be associated with HD and/or ED. In these cases, the degree of HD and ED at the radiographic examination at 1-2 years was of major importance, although many dogs with non-affected status also had clinical problems, particularly at the age of 10-11 years. \n \nthat a higher proportion of dogs were reported to suffer from symptoms of skeletal disease already at the age of 5-6 years but also at 10-11 years of age if they had HD (grade C, D or E) in comparison if they were free (ua) of the hips ( 48 or 29%, P = 0.055). \n \nthat this study did not demonstrate any significant effect of weight for the development of clinical symptoms in dogs that were still alive at 11-12 years of age. Contrary to the significant effect of weight at the age of 1 years old were increased weight was associated with radiological detectable HD and ED.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».