L’impact de la migraine sur le rendement et l’engagement occupationnels dans les activités de la vie quotidienne et domestique, et dans les loisirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: It is estimated that 26% of Canadians living with migraines are limited in their participation in meaningful activities due to this condition (Statistics Canada, 2014).However, beyond the impact on work, little research has explored how migraines affect personal care, leisure activities, and domestic tasks.Moreover, current studies rarely consider the meaning that individuals with migraines attribute to their daily functioning.Finally, while the literature clearly highlights gaps in primary medical care for migraines in Canada, it does not delve into the lived experiences of individuals regarding this care.Research questions: This study aimed to answer the following questions: 1) What is the impact of frequent migraines on occupational performance and engagement in activities of daily living, domestic activities, and leisure activities?2) How do individuals with migraines perceive their management of this condition, and how does this affect their occupational engagement?Conceptual Framework: To guide the exploration of the topic, it was necessary to establish a consensus regarding the definition of migraines.The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) was selected as the conceptual framework for this project.This model not only introduces the concepts of occupational performance and engagement but also provides relevant occupational categories for structuring the research.Methodology: An exploratory phenomenological study was conducted through semistructured individual interviews and the completion of a socio-demographic questionnaire.Participants were selected using network and snowball sampling.Quantitative data were subjected to simple descriptive analysis, while qualitative data were analyzed using Giorgi's content analysis method (1997).Results: Five individuals with migraines participated in the study.For the personal care activities, participants adjusted certain lifestyle habits to better manage their migraines, though these adjustments did not bring them enjoyment.The productivity activities were often neglected and/or adjusted, with participants expressing mixed levels of satisfaction.While leisure activities promoting well-being were prioritized, occupational engagement in these activities was not entirely satisfactory.Finally, four participants reported satisfaction with the healthcare services they received.However, none currently seek occupational therapy to support their daily functioning.Discussion: The findings align with prior research and underscore the critical role of occupational therapists in this population.This section also emphasizes the need to implement strategies to limit the impact of factors that predispose to or exacerbate migraines.Such strategies could ensure satisfactory occupational engagement for individuals with migraines.Conclusion: This research project demonstrates that migraines have adverse effects on occupational performance and engagement, primarily in leisure and productivity activities, while personal care activities are often used as recovery strategies.Despite this, individuals with migraines do not currently utilize occupational therapy services, even though the symptom management strategies highlighted by participants support the role of occupational therapists as experts in enabling occupation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».