Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Синютина В.Ю.Научный руководительдоцент Воног В.В. Сибирский федеральный университетEvery year about seventy thousand Russian citizens go abroad for permanent residence.Emigration always was the actual problem, but in modern Russia this question stands especially sharply.More than half of economically active Russians dream of working abroad, however the considerable part of them agrees to move only provided that the salary on a new place will be higher, than in Russia.According to the results of research working abroad is an end in itself only for 12 % of Russians: they would even accept an offer of the foreign employer when the salary in other country will be lower, than in the homeland.Respondents want to work «anywhere only not in Russia» for the sake of possibility to practise language and social guarantees.More often than the others Russians aged till 30 years (14 %) are ready to work abroad with a salary lower, than in Russia, because they would like to have a new experience and impressions.The majority of those who want to realize themselves abroad (45 %) agree to do it only for worthy monetary compensation.men more often chose this variant of the answer (51 % against 40 % among women).30 % of Russians wouldn't like to work abroad.Respondents don't want to leave by reason of an ignorance of language, the unwillingness to leave the family, fear not to get accustomed on a new place because of a mentality difference, and also negative experience abroad.There are more women (34 % against 25 % among men) among those who isn't ready on moving.Besides, the unwillingness to work abroad more often others is shown by Russians is more senior 50 years (43 %), as it is no wonder, after all at mature age the few are ready to risk stability and sharply to change the life.Every fifth participant of research has found it difficult to answer.So, why Russians want to leave abroad?People leave, because think: it will be better abroad.The abroad involves with a high standard of living, political predictability, safety and comfort.The dream of the developed west countries lives in many hearts, despite a staff deficit in the homeland.If total number left for living well -100 % programmers and the scientists, continuing to work on a profile, among them is less than others -10 %.The majority of Russians abroad is people from 35 years and is more senior, without higher education, with the working specialities received still in Soviet Union or Russia of 90th years.According to local residents that in Europe that in the USA the main problem of Russian -unwillingness to learn foreign languages.It brakes their career.Whom more often Russian work abroad as? USA and Canada have become lately the most popular routes of Russian citizens' labour immigration.The USA.Our compatriots in the United States of America are occupied basically in sphere of services, as a rule, work as barmen in inexpensive institutions.«They are young men, they know English, try to be pleasant to clients, but a little that are able», -the lawyer from Boston KrejgLouton shares the impressions.1800dollars -average earnings of the barman.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».