Mental Health Walk-In Clinics for Children and Families
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Approximately one in five children in Ontario have a mental health disorder causing significant distress and/or impairment. Yet only a third of these children receive specialized mental health services. One of the barriers to accessing care is long waitlists. Mental health walk-in clinics (MHWCs) can help address this issue by providing immediate support and removing administrative hassles for families (e.g., phone calls, intakes). The current dissertation sought to better understand the availability, implementation, and use of MHWCs.\nStudy 1 explored the availability of MHWCs across Canada. A brief survey was distributed to child and youth mental health (CYMH) agencies. Many CYMH agencies (73% total sample; 69% random sample) reported using this service delivery model. Study 2 examined the implementation of MHWCs in Ontario. An in-depth survey was distributed to CYMH agencies in Ontario. MHWCs are being used to provide timely and accessible services, as well as to serve as a point of intake for 44% of agencies. MHWCs are provided in different locations (e.g., agencies, schools) using different modalities (e.g., consulting break) and approaches (e.g., solution focused therapy). Most agencies quickly adapted to COVID-19 restrictions by providing virtual MHWCs.\nStudies 3 and 4 explored how families use MHWCs. Administrative data from two CYMH agencies in Ontario capturing a period of 3 to 6 years were extracted. Overall, 24% and 61% of families in Agency 1 and 2, respectively, used MHWCs at least once. About a third of families using MHWCs had 2 or more visits. Younger children, children in shared custody or under the guardianship of their birth/adoptive mother or father, and children that were not referred to other agency services had higher risk of a second MHWC visit. Over half of families use MHWCs alongside other agency services; most often, earlier in the service use trajectory. Older children, children in shared custody, and children who were referred to other agency services had higher odds of MHWC use before other services.\nIn summary, MHWCs were a common service delivery model in the CYMH agencies sampled in Ontario and in Canada. It is flexible, such that the implementation (e.g., modality, approach) can be tailored to fit the needs of an agency and community. MHWCs may be sufficient for 33-43% of families. Providing help in a MHWC visit without requiring a comprehensive intake or asking families to wait should enhance access for other families who require more intensive services. For other families (57-67%), MHWCs can help support them at the beginning of their service journey by providing initial support and linking them to other agency services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».