Marine Planning in British Columbia: An Evaluation of Haida Gwaii's Marine Plans and Marine Protected Area Management Plans
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Haida Gwaii, formerly known as Queen Charlotte Islands, is an archipelago of approximately 150 islands located in the Pacific North Coast of British Columbia. Increasing interest in marine spatial planning has led to marine plans and marine protected area management plans being developed to guide the sustainable management of marine areas in the region. Marine Spatial Planning is an iterative public process that analyzes and allocates the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities within marine areas to achieve ecological, economic, and social objectives identified during the planning and political process. Marine Spatial Planning processes have led to the development of the following marine plans and marine protected area management plans in and around Haida Gwaii: the Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area (PNCIMA) Plan; the Haida Gwaii Marine Plan; the Gwaii Haanas Land-Sea-People Management Plan; and the SGaan Kinghlas–Bowie Seamount Marine Protected Area Management Plan. The research presented in this report is guided by the following research objectives in order to evaluate the aforementioned plans: i. Develop a set of marine plan evaluation criteria based on academic and grey literature suitable for the evaluation of the marine plans and protected area management plans’ effectiveness; ii. Use the evaluation criteria developed in Research Objective i to evaluate the four plans that influence marine resource management and conservation in the Haida Gwaii marine sub-region discussed above; iii. Based on the evaluation, make recommendations for improvement to marine management in the Haida Gwaii marine sub-region, and in the marine spatial planning process in general. In addition to highlighting the limitations of this research, which include the lack of Indigenous perspectives and input, the lack of existing research on assessing marine plans and marine protected area management plans in academic and grey literature, as well as the overall limitations in existing management systems to implement the marine plans/marine protected area management plan, the main research recommendations for this report include the following: i. Indigenous leadership should be encompassed in all marine spatial planning processes and in the equitable co-management of marine areas, which will reinforce Canada’s commitment to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples across the coasts; ii. That the assessment of the effectiveness of marine plans and marine protected area management plans expand from the identification of necessary requirements based off the set of criteria and sub-criteria developed in this research report; iii. That marine plans and marine protected area management plans provide a timeframe from when it is endorsed to when the identified goals and objectives can be realized in order to provide a quantifiable analysis prior to conducting revisions of the plans; iv. The interdependence of land and offshore ecosystems also drives the need for more integration between land and marine use planning, as well as transboundary interactions beyond the scope of an identified marine area; and lastly, v. That a set of planning tools be identified that can legally support and enforce marine spatial plans in Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».