The Muhammad Cartoons: What are the issues? (Part 2 Q&A)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The publication of twelve cartoons last year lampooning the Prophet Muhammad has had huge impact around the world. Riots in many Muslim countries have caused deaths and destruction. Why are Muslims so angry and what are the issues?Four University of Lethbridge professors will present their views on some aspects:Dr. Bruce MacKay has a PhD in Religious Studies from the University of Toronto. He has studied Islam at Toronto and Harvard Universities and has lived in Jerusalem and traveled through Jordan, Egypt, Palestine and Israel. He has taught Islam at the University of Lethbridge. Dr. MacKay will discuss key principles of Islam and the historical context behind the prohibition of images of Muhammad. Dr. John von Heyking is Associate Professor of Political Science at the U of L and teaches courses in political philosophy and religion and politics. His PhD is from the University of Notre Dame. His publications include articles on religious freedom and the Charter, just war theory, deliberative democracy and Islamic politics. Dr. von Heyking''s talk will cover the readiness for rational political discussion in Islamic and Western Post-Enlightenment contexts.Dr. Tom Robinson has a PhD form McMaster University. He has taught at the U of L for twenty years. His research deals with orthodoxy and dissent in religious movements, and he has published various books on religion. His most recent book, co-authored with other members of the Religious Studies Department, is titled World Religions: a guide to the essentials (2006), for which he wrote several chapters, including the one on Islam. Dr. Robinson''s talk will deal with religious orthodoxy and dissent, religious attitudes to art, and the value of free and protected speech in a diverse world.Dr. Trudy Govier has a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Waterloo and is the author on a number of books, including Forgiveness and Revenge (2002) and Dilemmas of Trust (1997). She has taught ethics, philosophy of law, and history of philosophy and is currently teaching political philosophy and logic at the U of L.Dr. Govier will discuss conceptions of respect, freedom, and religious toleration. Time: 7:00 to 9:00 p.m.Location: Lethbridge Public Library, Theatre Gallery.THIS SPECIAL SESSION HAS BEEN ATRRANGED IN ASSOCIATION WITH LETHBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,109 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».