Monitoring des flux d'eau souterraine et de contaminants au sein d'aquifères hétérogènes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Groundwater is one of the most important natural resources of our planet and it requires appropriate management and protection in order to guarantee its availability for future generations. From a water quality point of view, old industrial activities and modern accidental releases have locally impacted groundwater resource. Management of these contaminated aquifers has historically relied on comparison between measured contaminant concentrations in groundwater and threshold values. This approach is a necessary early characterization step but is totally insufficient to fully investigate the contaminants behavior in groundwater and to quantify the associated risks. Since the beginning of the years 2000, a consensus has been growing among the scientific, technical and decision makers’ community on the fact that management of contaminated aquifers should be performed in terms of contaminant flux metrics. Accordingly, it has become necessary to dispose of techniques able to accurately measure mass fluxes and mass discharges of contaminants in aquifers. Contaminant mass flux usually relies on measurements of both groundwater flux and contaminant concentration in monitoring wells drilled in the aquifer of concern. Research efforts must lead to the proposition of new solutions, methodologies and techniques, in particular for measuring groundwater fluxes. In this work, the Finite Volume Point Dilution Method (FVPDM), is proposed as an innovative single-well method for monitoring groundwater fluxes in aquifers. Mathematical basis and a first analytical solutions allowing to interpret FVPDM experiments performed in steady state groundwater flow conditions were already developed and validated on a few field applications. In this research, a generalized FVPDM interpretation framework for monitoring groundwater fluxes over time is proposed, based on a new finite difference expression proposed to calculate groundwater fluxes from FVPDM experiments performed in transient groundwater flow fields. In a first step, the FVPDM technique was successively applied in various laboratory and field experiments allowing to define its accuracy, precision and resolution under transient groundwater flow conditions. A first lab-scale flow tank experiment demonstrated the accuracy of the FVPDM for groundwater fluxes measurements in both steady and transient state flow conditions. Difference between the prescribed water flux in the flow tank and the measured water flux using FVPDM was as low as 0.15 %. In a second experiment the FVPDM was applied to measure groundwater fluxes on several fractured zones of an open well installed in a crystalline rock aquifer. This constitutes the first successful application of the FVPDM technique in a fractured aquifer, using straddle packers. The classical point dilution method (PDM) was also applied during this experiment, under the same groundwater flow conditions to compare the sensitivity and uncertainty of both methods. It demonstrated that FVPDM generally provides a better precision than PDM but it may require longer experimental durations. A third FVPDM experiment undertaken in an alluvial aquifer allowed to validate in the field the method for monitoring rapidly changing groundwater fluxes. This first series of experiment allowed to validate the FVPDM as a fully operational method for measurements of groundwater fluxes for a wide spectrum of experimental and flow conditions. In a second step, three field-scale applications of the method were performed. The first relates to direct groundwater fluxes measurements in a sub-permafrost aquifer located in the remote territories of northern Quebec. These measurements came in support to a thermo-hydrodynamic model of a watershed where permafrost thaw occurs. This specific application demonstrated the robustness and versatility of the FVPDM. In a second field application, the FVPDM was used to monitor, under controlled conditions a solute mass discharge experiment undertaken in a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer at a series of control planes in order to compare different methods for calculating the total mass discharge based on discrete groundwater fluxes and concentration measurements. In a third application, the FVPDM was successfully used in a groundwater pollution investigation to characterize highly transient groundwater flows and pollutant mass fluxes within a coastal aquifer influenced by marked tides. The results of this experiment allowed to improve and refine the conceptual site model and provided crucial information for optimizing further investigations and risk mitigation measures at this polluted site. The FVPDM was applied in a wide range of environmental contexts, of application scales, of experimental setups, of aquifer types, of time scales, of groundwater flow conditions, and for both research and consultant-type purposes. The FVPDM was proven to be a robust and versatile method that provides high-quality reliable groundwater flux data for general hydrogeological characterizations and for contaminant mass fluxes monitoring, even under highly transient flow conditions. From a more general perspective, this research demonstrated the great importance and the huge benefits of having direct and reliable in situ measurements of groundwater fluxes for any kind of hydrogeological studies. This research proves once more the value of undertaking mass flux measurements for characterization of contaminated sites, risk assessment and design of risk mitigation measures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».