MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7051625330

The Oxford companion to the economics of China

2014· article· en· W7051625330 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaGovernment (linguistics)Chinese economyPopulationSubject (documents)Chinese financial systemAgriculture
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

China's rise as an economic powerhouse raises a number of questions that are the subject of lively debate. How did the country do it? How applicable are the lessons of China's economic reform of the past thirty years to the challenges it faces in the next three decades? What does the detailed pattern of China's success and challenges look like the sub-sectoral and sub-national levels, and what does this mean for future policy? How will China's role as a global economic player evolve? This Oxford Companion to the Economics of China presents an original collection of perspectives on the Chinese economy's past, present and future. The contributors of these entries include: the best of young Chinese researchers based in China and outside; renowned academics from the top universities in China, Europe, and North America; present and past senior officials of international agencies like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund; senior Chinese government officials from the Centre and the Provinces; and four recipients of the Nobel Prize in Economics. The Companion consists of 99 entries written by the leading China analysts of our time. The topics covered include: The China Model, Future Prospects for China , China and the Global Economy, Trade and the Chinese Economy, Macroeconomics and Finance, Urbanisation, Industry and Markets, Agriculture and Rural Development, Land, Infrastructure and Environment, Population and Labour, Dimensions of Wellbeing and Inequality, Health and Education, Gender Equity, Regional Divergence in China, and China's Provinces: Selected Perspectives. The Editors are four global leaders in Chinese economic analysis and policy who between them have held or hold the following positions: Director General, International Food Policy Research Institute; Co-Editor, China Economic Review; President Chinese Economists Society; Assistant Director of Research at the IMF; Principal Adviser to the Chief Economist of the World Bank; and Professors of Economics at Ivy League Universities. Contributors to this volume - Franklin Allen, University of Pennsylvania Doug Almond, Columbia University Kym Anderson, University of Adelaide Wan BaoRui, Ministry of Agriculture Pranab Bardhan, University of California, Berkeley Chad Bown, The World Bank Loren Brandt, University of Toronto Deborah Brautigam, Johns Hopkins University/SAIS Hongbin Cai, Peking University Ximing Cai, University of Illinois Zongsheng Chen, Nankai University Xi Chen, Yale University Yang Chenhua, Development Research Center Menzie Chinn, University of Wisconsin Zhang Chuanting, Policy Research Center of Shandong Province Simon Cox, The Economist Alan de Brauw, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Sylvie Demurger, Universite Lumiere Yongheng Deng, National University of Singapore Chengri Ding, University of Maryland David Dollar, Brookings Institution Xiao-yuan Dong, University of Winnipeg Qu Dongyu, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Julan Du, Chinese University of Hong Kong Richard Easterlin, University of Southern California Shenggen Fan, International Food Policy Research Institute Cai Fang, Chinese Academy of Social Science Hanming Fang, University of Pennsylvania Ross Garnaut, University of Melbourne Roger Gordon, University of California, San Diego Wei Li, Cheung Kong GSB Nathaniel Grotte, University of Chicago The Late Robert Fogel Gordon Hanson, University of California, San Diego Ann Harrison, University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School Dong He, Hong Kong Monetary Authority James Heckman, University of Chicago Junjian Yi, University of Chicago Vernon Henderson, Brown University Trevor Houser, Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics Jikan Huang, Chinese Academy of Sciences Yasheng Huang, MIT Sloan School of Management Yiping Huang, Peking University Hi Tang Jie, Shenzhen Government Ravi Kanbur, Cornell University John Knight, University of Oxford Samuel Krumholz, UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Haizheng Li, Georgia Institute of Technology Qinyi Liu, Hunan University, China Hongbin Li, Tsinghua University Edwin Lim, CERAP Shuanglin Lin, University of Nebraska Omaha Justin Yifu Lin, Peking University Gordon Liu, Peking University Feng Lu, Peking University Yi Lu, National University of Singapore Xiaopeng Luo, Zheijang University Guonan Ma, Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Aaditya Mattoo, The World Bank Lingsheng Meng, Tsinghua University Xin Meng, Australian National University Michelle Miro, University of Illinois Victor Nee, Cornell University Sonja Opper, Lund University Keijiro Kei Otsuka, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) Yao Pan, George Washington University Albert Park, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Dai Peikun, Anhui Development Research Center Dwight Perkins, Harvard University Eswar Prasad, Cornell University Ye Qi, Tsinghua University Nancy Qian, Yale University Yingyi Qian, Tsinghua University Jun ( "QJ ") Qian, Boston College Xie Qingsheng, Guizhou University of China Futian Qu, Nanjing Agricultural University Martin Ravallion, The World Bank Carl Riskin, Columbia University Peter Robertson, University of Western Australia Wang Rong, Peking University Nouriel Roubini, New York University Scott Rozelle, Stanford University Wang Sangui, Renmin University of China Jinchuan Shi, Zhejiang University Stephen Smith, George Washington University Lina Song, University of Nottingham Zheng Song, Chicago Booth Ligang Song, The Australian National University Canberra Michael Spence, New York University Joseph Stiglitz, Columbia University Arvind Subramanian, Peterson Institute of International Economics Laixiang Sun, SOAS, University of Toronto Zhigang Tao, University of Hong Kong Guoqiang Tian, University of Texas A & M Kai-yuen Tsui, Chinese University of Hong Kong Calum Turvey, Cornell University Guo Wanda, China Development Institute (CDI) Hua Wang, The World Bank Jici Wang, Peking University Jing Wang, University of Western Ontario Shang-Jin Wei, Columbia University John Whalley, University of Western Ontario Adam Wolfe, New York University Yanrui Wu, University of Western Australia Yu Xie, University of Michigan Bin Xu, China Europe International Business School Chenggang Xu, University of Hong Kong Dennis Tao, Chinese University of Hong Kong Yang Yao, CCER, Peking University Du Ying, National Development and Reform Commission Boyang Zhang, Cornell University Weiying Zhang, Peking University Xiaobo Zhang, Peking University and International Food Policy Research Institute Yaohui Zhao, Peking University Changwen Zhao, China State Development Research Center Funing Zhong, Nanjing Agricultural University Cui Zhongren, Guangxi Development Research Center Ling Zhu, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CESS) Huang Zuhui, Zhejiang University

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,542
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,444

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle