Osgoode Conference Looks at Corruption and What to Do about It
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Osgoode Conference Looks at Corruption and What to Do about It\nTORONTO, November 3, 2014 – York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School will host a major conference on November 6 and 7, 2014 that will look at corruption in business, finance, government and enforcement.\n“Understanding and Taming Public and Private Corruption in the 21st Century” will bring together top Canadian and international legal, political and media experts to explore what makes these sectors vulnerable to corruption, the systems that undermine anti-corruption intentions, and the failures of transparency and accountability efforts.\n“Corruption is not only a major problem for developing countries, it is also a critical issue for Canada in 2014,” said Professor François Tanguay-Renaud, Director of Osgoode’s Jack & Mae Nathanson Centre on Transnational Human Rights, Crime and Security, which is hosting the conference in partnership with the Osgoode Hall Law Journal.\n“In the past few years, there have been many disturbing high-profile cases of corruption that have garnered considerable media attention, generated public inquiries, and led to unprecedented court cases,” Tanguay-Renaud said. “These events have demonstrated that no level of government, agency or corporation is immune from corruption schemes. This conference will reflect critically on some of those experiences and responses to them.”\nThe conference is co-chaired by Ron Atkey, Adjunct Professor of National Security at Osgoode; Margaret Beare, Professor of Law and Sociology at Osgoode and York; and Cynthia Williams, Professor of Law and Osler Chair in Business Law at Osgoode. Key themes that will be explored at the conference include: •\nCorruption in undermining international economic development; •\nCorruption as a facilitator of organized crime; •\nCorrupt interactions between business and government; •\nCorruption within government institutions; •\nThe UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC); •\nThe Foreign Corrupt Practices Acts and their extra-terrestrial reach; •\nThe adequacy of whistle-blowing legislation, policies and practices.\nKeynote speaker will be John Sandage, Director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime’s Division for Treaty Affairs. In addition, leading thinkers on corruption will participate in panel discussions that will analyze recent domestic and transnational events in Canada and abroad from a wide variety of cutting-edge legal, sociological, and political perspectives, and propose constructive ways forward. Among the speakers, Julian Sher, Senior Producer at CBC’s the fifth estate, and John Ibbitson and Adam Radwanski, both of the Globe and Mail, will present on the media’s role in exposing corruption, and responsibilities of the media generally to accurately report levels and types of corruption.\nWHAT: “Understanding and Taming Public and Private Corruption in the 21st Century” AGENDA\nWHEN: Thurs. Nov. 6, 2014 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. & Fri. Nov. 7, 2014 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.\nWHERE: Moot Court (Room 1005), Osgoode Hall Law School of York University MAP\nREGISTRATION: HERE\n-30-\nYork University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U’s community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 250,000 alumni.\nMedia Contact:\nVirginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,036 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».