Osgoode Hall Law School Adopts New Indigenous And Aboriginal Law Requirement: “A Genuine Watershed Moment,” Says Dean
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
TORONTO, April 6, 2018 – York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School will introduce an Indigenous and Aboriginal Law Requirement in its Juris Doctor (JD) degree program starting this September.\nThe new degree requirement is aligned with Osgoode’s commitment to reconciliation, one of five priorities outlined in the Access Osgoode Strategic Plan 2017-2020. It is also Osgoode’s response to the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s Call to Action #28 that called upon Canadian law schools to require all law students to take a course in Aboriginal people and the law.\nOsgoode Dean Lorne Sossin hailed the new Indigenous and Aboriginal Law Requirement as “a genuine watershed moment for legal education at Osgoode and reflects the engagement and commitment of our whole community – with lots of important work and reconciliation discussions to come.\nThe new degree requirement was unanimously adopted by Osgoode Faculty Council on March 16 and approved on April 4 by York’s Academic Standards, Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee. It will mean that all graduates of Osgoode’s JD program must complete at least one course that engages in a substantial way with all three of the following: Indigenous law (law that stems from Indigenous communities); Aboriginal law (non-Indigenous law, including Canadian law, as it pertains to Indigenous people); and Aspects of professionalism and/or practice skills related to serving Indigenous clients, which may include intercultural competency, conflict resolution, human rights and anti-racism. \nThere are a number of courses in the current Osgoode curriculum that students will be able to choose from to fulfill the Indigenous and Aboriginal Law Requirement, according to Signa Daum Shanks, Assistant Professor and inaugural Director of Indigenous Outreach at Osgoode.\nDaum Shanks is one of the faculty and student members of the Academic Policy and Planning Committee’s Indigenization Subcommittee who spent the past two years studying the role of Indigenous issues in the Osgoode JD curriculum to bring forward the proposal for a new degree requirement.\n“The two topics of Indigenous law and Aboriginal law have increased in such rapid scope that it is unimaginable to think a lawyer can go without learning about these subjects,” said Daum Shanks. “As we invite our community and elsewhere to become more exposed to the issues these areas contain, I’m so proud that Osgoode recognizes their relevance within its curriculum’s basic structure.”\nOsgoode Hall Law School has a long history of commitment to Indigenous and Aboriginal law studies, building relationships with Indigenous communities, and recruiting Indigenous students.\nThe law school’s Intensive Program in Aboriginal Lands, Resources and Governments was established in 1994. In 2014, Osgoode’s first annual Anishinaabe Law Camp was held at Neyaashiinigmiing (Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation) on Georgian Bay. It brings Indigenous and non-Indigenous students and faculty members together with elders and knowledge keepers to learn about Anishinaabe law and Indigenous legal tradition.\nMore recently, the law school welcomed Daum Shanks, who is Métis, as its first Director of Indigenous Outreach, and Associate Professor Deborah McGregor, a member of Whitefish River First Nation, as Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Environmental Justice. As well, Associate Professor Karen Drake, a Métis from northern Ontario, recently became part of Osgoode’s faculty and is also a commissioner with the Ontario Human Rights Commission. In addition, the law school will hire a Coordinator of Indigenous and Reconciliation Initiatives this year.\n-30-\nAbout Osgoode Hall Law School\nOsgoode Hall Law School of York University has a proud history of 129 years of leadership and innovation in legal education and legal scholarship. A total of about 900 students are enrolled in Osgoode’s three-year Juris Doctor (JD) Program as well as joint and combined programs. The school’s Graduate Program in Law is also the largest in the country and one of the most highly regarded in North America. In addition, Osgoode Professional Development, which operates out of Osgoode’s facility in downtown Toronto, offers both degree and non-degree programming for Canadian and international lawyers, non-law professionals, firms and organizations. Osgoode has an internationally renowned faculty of 60 full-time professors, and more than 100 adjunct professors. Our respected community of more than 18,000 alumni are leaders in the legal profession and in many other fields in Canada and across the globe. \nAbout York University\nYork University is known for championing new ways of thinking that drive teaching and research excellence. Our students receive the education they need to create big ideas that make an impact on the world. Meaningful and sometimes unexpected careers result from cross-discipline programming, innovative course design and diverse experiential learning opportunities. York students and graduates push limits, achieve goals and find solutions to the world’s most pressing social challenges, empowered by a strong community that opens minds. York U is an internationally recognized research university – our 11 faculties and 26 research centres have partnerships with 200+ leading universities worldwide. Located in Toronto, York is the third largest university in Canada, with a strong community of 53,000 students, 7,000 faculty and administrative staff, and more than 295,000 alumni. York U’s fully bilingual Glendon campus is home to Southern Ontario’s Centre of Excellence for French Language and Bilingual Postsecondary Education.\nMedia Contacts: Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca \nSandra McLean, York University Media Relations, 416-736-2100 ext. 22097, sandramc@yorku.ca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,019 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,009 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,048 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».