Performative architecture: inspiring the performance of architecture through the movement of dance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How does movement influence architecture and, in turn, how does architecture influence movement? It is through the design of the Sudbury Movement Centre where this architectural approach is demonstrated. The Sudbury Movement Centre (SMC) will be a building devoted entirely to movement, inspiring and provoking the movement of people in the space. Situated in Sudbury’s downtown core, the building will be conceived as a compliment to the existing Sudbury Theatre Centre (STC). Through the architectural gestures in designing the SMC, an architectural relationship will be developed between the two buildings, enhancing, adjusting and modifying the experience of the existing theatre into an entire complex dedicated to movement. As a choreographer, my experience with movement finds itself seeking to influence my architectural expression. There are indeed studied parallels between dance and architecture. The theories of performance developed by Marvin Carlson, Richard Schechner, Erving Goffman and A.L Austin for example, have led to a critical understanding of 'performative’ architecture. From a choreographic perspective, the work of Rudolf Laban, Oskar Schlemmer and Cilliam Forsythe have become imperative to my research and design development. Each choreographer has developed an understanding of the movement by exploring and analyzing dance through three-dimensional and two dimensional methods. In an architectural sense, three case studies were researched, each addressing the parallels between dance and architecture in three unique ways; provoking movement, representing movement and the process of movement in two disciplines. Where these studies have successfully developed the connection between the two disciplines, my interpretation takes a different approach to the discipline and its potential as an architectural process. Chile these studies have become the grounding to my research-creation, my own work seeks to take this beyond a metaphorical interpretation. In order to understand architecture through a choreographic lens, the act of generating choreography was key to developing an architecture of movement. I then captured the choreography in a method that abstracted the movement of the dancers as a movement through space, a notational exploration which worked to translate the complexity of three-dimensional movement into a two-dimensional space. This process expanded my understanding of performed movement and a new perspective of my choreography became evident. A perspective that analyzes movement through a choreographic and architectural lens making clear the nuances in the movement gestures. It is these nuances that translate to a movement inspired architecture. The gestures of the choreography become the gestures of the architecture where each shapes the building form and informs the tectonic details of architectural design.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,030 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».