Predictors of Loneliness and Transitions in Loneliness in Ontario Home Care Clients: Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background \nOlder adults over the age of 65 receiving home care services are particularly vulnerable to experiencing loneliness and social isolation. Loneliness and social isolation have been associated with adverse health outcomes, including depression, cardiovascular disease, and mortality, as well as increased service utilization. Research has widely explored cross-sectional predictors of loneliness, though factors that predict the onset of loneliness, particularly in the home care population remain largely understudied. With the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating rates of social isolation, loneliness, and exposure to predictors, further research is necessary to understand how the pandemic influenced the risk of loneliness and the onset of loneliness in the Ontario older adult home care population. \n \nObjectives \nThe goal of this research was to identify predictors of loneliness and the onset of loneliness that were significant prior to and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario. The way in which the COVID-19 pandemic modified the relationship between loneliness and predictors was also explored. \n \nMethods \nSecondary data analysis was conducted using Ontario interRAI Home Care data collected between September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2020. The sample was divided into two subsamples, the “comparison” and “COVID” sample to conduct respective bivariate and multivariate analyses. Bivariate analyses guided the development of six binary logistic regression models that were selected with modified stepwise selection. The final multivariate models determined cross-sectional predictors of loneliness at T1 and longitudinal predictors of the onset of loneliness at T2 in both sub-samples. Two additional models explored the main effect and interaction effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the onset of loneliness across the entire study sample. A social isolation scale was developed to supplement the analysis. \n \nResults \nRisk of loneliness and onset of loneliness with found to be associated with several demographic, physical, clinical, psychological, social, and environmental variables. Variations in risk factor significance was present across models, though sex, LHIN region, sleep disturbance, ADL impairment, depressive symptoms and social isolation were consistent across all models indicating that these factors had a considerable association with loneliness prior to and during the pandemic. When significant, depressive symptoms, anhedonia, geographic variations, and social isolation demonstrated the strongest association with loneliness. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a slight increase in loneliness rates and significant interactions demonstrated that the pandemic exacerbated the influence of several risk factors on loneliness. \n \nConclusion \nThe prevention and reduction of loneliness must be targeted through an integrated approach by practitioners, home care organizations, researchers, and program and policy makers to combat risk factors of all dimensions beyond those that are clinical. Future research should aim to fill the gaps presented in this research and work to develop evidence-based indicators and practice protocols to aid in systematic risk identification and intervention of loneliness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».