PROSES PERALIHAN WALI NASAB KE WALI HAKIM DALAM KASUSWALI ADHALMELALUI \nPENETAPANPENGADILAN AGAMA \nKELAS IB BATUSANGKAR
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PROSES PERALIHAN WALI NASAB KE WALI HAKIM DALAM KASUS WALI ADHAL MELALUIPENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA \nKELAS IB BATUSANGKAR \n \nYuliaRoza, NIM. 1620123053. Program Magister Kenotarian Fakultas Hukum Andalas Padang. Halaman 125 Tahun 2018. \n \n \nABSTRAK \nMajelis telah berusaha menasehati pemohon untuk mendekati dan membujuk wali pemohon (ayah pemohon) agar mau menikahkan pemohon dengan calon suami pemohon, tetapi tidak berhasil sedang pemohon menyatakan tetap ingin menikah dengan calon suami pemohon. Bahwamajelistelah pula menasehati ayah Pemohon agar bersediauntukmenjadiwalinasabanaknya, akantetapiusahatersebuttidakberhasil. BahwasetelahdibacakanPermohonanpemohon yang isinyatetapdipertahankanolehPemohon.alasanwalinasabdaricalonmempelaiperempuantidakmaumenikahkananaknyaadalahmasalahkomunikasi yang tidakterbangundenganefektif, sehinggawalinasabberasumsitidakmaumenikahkananaknyakarenatidakikutsertamendidik, mengasuhdanmembesarkan sang anak. Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1B BatusangkardalamMenetapkanWaliAdhalPadaPerkaraNomor. 0081/Pdt.P/2014/PA.Bskadalahwalipemohonhadir di persidanganakantetapidiakeberatan (enggan) sebagaiwalinikahpemohon,dankeberatanwalipemohontersebuttidakberalasan, olehkarnaitumajelismenetapkanbahwawalipemohonadalahadhal (enggan). Proses pernikahan yang dilakukan di KUA dalamkasuswaliadhaladalah 1). PengirimanBerkas-Berkas yang berkaittentang data pernikahan, 2).PPN memanggilpihak-pihak yang bekepentinganseperticalonpengantin, 3). PPN Mencatattentang proses pernikahandan 4). PelaksanaanAkadNikah. \n \nKata Kunci: WaliNasab, Wali Hakim, WaliAdhal \n \n \n \n \nTHE TRANSITATION PROCESS OF THE NASAB GUARDIAN TO THE JUDGE GUARDIAN IN THE CASE OF THE ADHAL GUARDIAN IS THROUGH THE DETERMINATION OF RELIGIOUS COURT \nIB BATUSANGKAR CLASS \n \nYulia Roza, NIM. 1620123053. Kenotarian Masters Program at Andalas Law Faculty, Padang. Page 125 of 2018. \n \nABSTRACT \nBackground problem in Case Number. 0081 / Pdt.P / 2014 / PA.Bsk was triggered because the assembly had tried to advise the applicant to approach and persuade the applicant's guardian (the applicant's father) to marry the applicant's marriage with the applicant's husband, that the council also advised the Petitioner's father to be a guardian Nasab's child, but the attempt was unsuccessful. The formulation of the problem in this study is about the reasons for the patronage of the prospective bride not to marry off her child, consideration of the Judge of the Class 1B Religious Court Batusangkar in determining Guardian Adhal in Case Number. 0081 / Pdt.P / 2014 / PA.Bsk and the marriage process conducted in KUA in the case of guardian adhal. The type of approach used in this study is a normative juridical and juridical, empirical juridical approach, meaning data obtained by referring to the empirical juridical aspects used as a tool. So the juridical empirical approach in this study is that in analyzing the problem carried out by integrating legal materials (secondary data) with primary data obtained in the field. While the normative juridical approach is a method of legal research conducted by examining library material or mere secondary data.This research is descriptive analysis, is to provide the data studied as closely as possible about humans, circumstances or other symptoms. This research is descriptive analysis, is to provide the data studied as closely as possible about humans, circumstances or other symptoms. the population in this study is each determination of the Batusangkar IB Class Religion Court relating to the determination of the judge's guardian as a marriage guardian because of the presence of adhal Guardian. The results showed that the reason for the patronage of the prospective bride did not want to marry her child was a problem of communication that was not built effectively, so the guardian assumed he would not marry his child because he did not participate in educating, nurturing and raising the child and also because the guardian had conflict internal with the mother of the child. Consideration of Judges of the Class 1B Religious Court Batusangkar in Appointing Guardian Adhal in Case Number. 0081 / Pdt.P / 2014 / PA.Bsk is the guardian of the applicant present at the hearing but he objected (reluctantly) as the applicant's marriage guardian, and the objection of the applicant's guardian was unwarranted, because of that the assembly stipulated that the applicant's guardian was adhal (reluctant) . The marriage process carried out in KUA in the case of a guardian is 1). Delivery of files related to marriage data, 2). PPN calls on interested parties such as brides and grooms, 3). PPN Records about the marriage process and 4). Implementation of Marriage Agreement. \nKeywords: Nasab Guardian, Judge Guardian, Adhal Guardian
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,072 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».