Racial Stereotypes, Identity, and Identity Denial among East Asian Canadians
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The model minority stereotype ascribes East Asian minorities with positive characteristics such as intelligent and hardworking, and at the same time, with negative traits like socially-awkward and emotionally-reserved. Three studies investigated the psychological effects of the two sides of this stereotype on East Asian Canadian young adults as well as factors that may moderate or mediate these effects. Study 1 (N = 208) was a correlational study that explored the association between different stereotype aspects and well-being. Negative stereotypes were consistently linked to poorer well-being and lower self-esteem, but the relation between positive stereotypes and outcomes was moderated by generational status. Positive stereotypes were related to better well-being and higher self-esteem among first-generation participants, but to poorer well-being and lower self-esteem among second-generation participants. Study 2 had an experimental, between-subjects design, in which Chinese Canadian participants (N = 95) were asked to recall and write about an experience in which they were attributed with either a positive or a negative stereotypical trait (positive stereotype and negative stereotype conditions, respectively) or with a non-stereotypical trait (control). Contrary to predictions, there were no statistically significant condition effects on the primary outcome measures (well-being, state self-esteem, mainstream and heritage acculturation). Study 3 was an experimental laboratory study in which East Asian Canadian participants (N = 108) were either positively stereotyped (stereotyping condition) or not stereotyped (control) by an experimenter (who was either White or East Asian) in a social interaction before completing a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. As hypothesized, participants who had been stereotyped responded differently on some of the outcome measures than those who had not been stereotyped, and this difference was moderated by generational status. Relative to their non-stereotyped counterparts, stereotyped first-generation participants reported less mainstream identity denial whereas stereotyped second-generation participants reported more mainstream identity denial and lower mainstream acculturation. Experimenter race was not a moderator nor was identity denial a mediator of the relation between stereotyping condition and well-being outcomes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the model minority stereotype is like a double-edged sword, both in content and its associated outcomes for East Asian Canadians, with second-generation individuals perhaps at greater risk for negative outcomes. Limitations, directions for future research, and implications are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».