MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7052629466

Studies in the contextualisation of mid-sixteenth-century Scottish verse

2010· dissertation· en· W7052629466 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow) · 2010
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiquePlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMcGill University
Mots-clésLiminalityHistoriographyMeaning (existential)The RenaissanceIdentity (music)Cultural identityPeriod (music)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Studying Scottish culture generally poses agreeable challenges. For the student of Scottish Renaissance literature, a ease in kind is 'the liminal position of Scotland's "early modern moment'', overshadowed by the centralized and long-established canonization of the English Elizabethan Renaissance'.' However, such a challenge can be turned into an opportunity to emerge from under that shadow: 'precisely because in small, minority, emergent cultures ... identity can never be taken as given, these are privileged sites for the study of ... the formation of identity' and for the unsettling of dominant orthodoxies.2 Following that cue, the present thesis analyses the formation of Scottish cultural identity and interrogates 'dominant orthodoxies' of cultural-historical inquiry, both English and Scottish, in the area of mid-sixteenth-century Scottish literature, in particular in that most defining of contemporary genres, the short lyric. It will do so not by looking at the texts themselves (other than incidentally or indirectly), or through one or more particular literary-theoretical approaches, but rather by applying a more traditional model of cultural historiography in areas where the history of ideas and book history overlap, and in a manner that accommodates Quentin Skinner's advice that 'we should study not the meaning of the words, but their use'.3 The thesis does so by mapping the most likely audience (or: 'users') of the most important Scottish literary manuscript of the period in hand, the Bannatyne MS (compiled 1565-1568), complementing that by subsequently contextualising the life events of its most prominent lyricist alive at the time, Alexander Scott. The inclusion of biographical detail in both these components is not part of a psychoanalytical or Romantic 'life into text' model but rather tries to piece together what kind of sensibilities or (inter)national cultural influences Scott's connections suggest, and what the identity and cultural profile of his audience(s) may tell us of the poetics he was writing within or towards. The value of this approach lies in its aggregative synthesis, distinguishing literary and cultural-historical patterns in otherwise isolated studies of instances of literature, patterns that in their turn should inform future criticism of individual texts. The end result is a narrated database that is more than the sum of its parts, a matrix of cultural-historical reference that should function as a tool for future scholarship, including more exclusively textual studies of contemporary literature. To provide this matrix, the thesis in Chapter 1 sets out the nature of the problem, and the research question to be answered. In Chapter 2, a prosopographical study of the apparent mid-sixteenth-century network of readers of the Bannatyne MS will bring into focus cultural intermediaries (individuals, families, and printers, as well as institutions such as the Chapel Royal, church and court) that triggered, channeled, 'consumed' or otherwise engaged with cultural expression in contemporary lowland Scotland. Chapter 3 uses this enhanced awareness of the world of letters in contemporary Scotland and, in particular, Edinburgh, to inform an approach of its major lyricist that studies not what he writes, but - by analysing his life events and career as well as how these correlate to his most likely readership as outlined in Chapter 2 - why and how he writes, and how he, arguably, expected his work to be read.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,276
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,583

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow)Même sujetPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207