‘Showing it off’: The Potential for the use of Underwater Heritage Parks to Present In-situ Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Netherlands
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For the public, underwater heritage parks amalgamate the thrill of sports diving with the\neducational enjoyment of a museum. Consequently, underwater heritage parks have been a\npopular medium to present in-situ underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in countries, such as\nAustralia, the UK, Finland, Sweden, Canada and the US. However, this method to present insitu UCH is not used in the Netherlands. Within the context of the Dutch government’s\nrecent decision to ratify the Faro Convention (Council of Europe 2005) and the growing blue\ntourism economy and diving community within the country, this thesis assesses the\neffectiveness of underwater heritage parks and explores the plausibility of utilising this\napproach within the Netherlands. Through an analysis of literature and case studies\npertaining to the global use of underwater heritage parks, this thesis first analyses the\nchallenges and opportunities that underwater heritage parks present for heritage\nmanagement and determines that the challenges can be mitigated. This makes underwater\nheritage parks an effective tool for heritage management. However, this also highlights a\nneed to explore the challenges and opportunities that underwater heritage parks potentially\nbring nearby residents. Through an analysis of the case study of the Museum of Underwater\nArt, Australia, this thesis found that underwater heritage parks can bring societal,\nenvironmental, and economic benefits to the communities that they are located nearby.\nThis can be achieved sustainably when mitigating the harmful impacts of heritage tourism\nthrough working with the ongoing consent of nearby residents, providing honest and\npositive experiences for tourists, and competitiveness cluster strategies. However, all of this\ncan only be accomplished when the sustainability of the UCH resources of an underwater\nheritage park can be ensured. Through an analysis of case studies in Croatia, Sweden and\nFinland, this thesis determines that sustainable diver access can be achieved through\nprotective methods of site protection, which use prohibitive equipment or create tour\nguides through commercial dive operators. However, sustainable access can also be\nachieved through admissive methods of site protection, which allow unrestricted access but\nprotect UCH through community stewardship, legislation, or initiatives that have\nsuccessfully changed attitudes towards UCH. However, changing attitudes towards UCH also\nnecessitates reaching the non-diving community. This thesis explores how underwater\nheritage parks have accomplished this and through the case study of Fathom Five Marine\nParks, Canada, states that a multi-faceted approach that provides a broad range of ways to\ninteract with UCH is most effective. Having established the effectiveness of underwater\nheritage parks and the best methods to provide access to UCH and ensure the sustainability\nof the resource, this thesis then assesses where this approach could be utilised within the\nNetherlands. Through building on O’Brien and colleagues (2011, 87) matrices of activities\nthat contradict cultural heritage conservation, based from Ehler and Douvere (2009, 58-59),\nthis thesis found that underwater heritage parks could present in-situ UCH at Cuijk,\nEuropoort, Grevelingen, Hellevoetsluis, IJsselmeer, Maasdriel, Oostvoornse Meer, and the\nWadden Sea.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».