Twilight in the Zone of Insolvency: Fiduciary Duty and Creditors of Troubled Companies - Comparative & International Perspectives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our panel will talk about comparative and international perspectives.I am going to start with a brief introduction, then I am going to call on Andreas Engert to give an explanation of some key conceptual points that are important to understanding the problem we are dealing with in the European context.Hanno Merkt is then going to give us a very rapid geographical tour of how these problems are dealt with in several jurisdictions.I am then going to ask Donna McKenzie-Skene to talk about a very interesting exercise that people in the United Kingdom have gone through considering exactly what treatment should be given to fiduciary duty-the duty of directors to people other than the shareholders-and whether that problem should be left simply to the jurisprudence or treated by stating standards in a statute.Finally, I am going to ask Pamela Huff to give an assessment of this problem from Canada, a jurisdiction that shares traits with those of us in Europe and, of course, the U.S., which we have been hearing about all day.My introduction is set out in a slide presentation entitled "Twilight in the Zone of Insolvency-View from the EU," and consists of a whirlwind tour of some key points.The first concerns the EU legal context.On the screen is a map of the European Union.It shows that we started off with six countries in 1957, which seems like a long time ago.Several other countries joined, as shown on the screen.We now have twenty-five countries in the EU.' Keep in mind that along with the EU there is a separate institution called the European Economic Area, or "EEA," to which the EU member states and three other jurisdictions belong.In those three countries, by virtue of EEA membership, many of the rules that are applicable in the EU also apply.In fact, the EEA countries are part of the free-trade zone with the EU.So there are at least twenty-five 1.At the time of the conference, there were twenty-five member states in the EU, but, as of January 21, 2007, there were twenty-seven member states.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».