Thesis_Ali Motalebi
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Very limited research has been conducted to study odour and toxic gas emissions (e.g. NO2, SO2, H2S, VOCs) from oil refineries in Canada similar to everywhere else in the world. The main goal of this thesis was to study odour and toxic gases impact of an oil refinery on surrounding environment in Western Canada. The performance of a recently developed portable olfactometer, SM 100 (IDES Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) was evaluated by comparison its results with results of a standard dynamic laboratory olfactometer on odour concentrations of n-butanol and poultry barn exhausted air. Results demonstrated that the difference between odour concentrations measured by SM 100 and the lab olfactometer was not significant (P>0.05). Results also demonstrated that odour concentrations measured by SM 100 and the standard dynamic lab olfactometer were close as all 16 measured odour samples fit within 20% margin of the parity plot comparing log odour concentrations measured by two devices. Odour properties including odour concentration (OC), odour intensity (OI), hedonic tone (HT), odour character, and relationships among them were investigated for the oil refinery odour through two field measurement campaigns conducted in radius of 7 km from the oil refinery in summer and spring. Results showed that odour could be detected in further distances in spring (up to 6.7 km) than summer (2.3 km) due to more stable atmospheric in spring. An exponential relationship were established between OC and OI (R2=0.8). It was found that there was a linear relationship between HT and OI (R2=0.81) in which odour character did not have a main effect. Although, HT is defined independent from OI, this study demonstrated that panelists were stimulated by intensity of odour rather than solely by its pleasantness and unpleasantness. Odour impact of the oil refinery on surrounding environment was investigated using the developed OERs, five years meteorological data and odour complaint data recorded by the plant leading to developing source-specific odour impact criteria for the oil refinery. Results demonstrated that odour limit of 1 OU with the odour-free occurrence frequency of 99.9% could be an appropriate criterion in managing odour problems posed by oil refineries for densely populated residential area with sensitive spots that provides them with a setback distance of 2.7 to 5.2 km. Odour limit of 2 OU with the odour-free occurrence frequency of 99.9% could be an appropriate option for scarcely populated residential area without sensitive spots and urban commercial which results in a setback distance range of 1.8 to 4 km. Odour limit of 4 OU is suggested for industrial land use resulting in a setback distance of 0.8 to 2.5 km. Finally, the odour limit of 6 OU with the odour-free occurrence frequency of 99.9% is suggested for agricultural land uses which leads to a setback distance range of 0.5 to 2.2 km. Toxic gas dispersions from the oil refinery was investigated using plume measurements by portable gas analyzers, data obtained from the air quality monitoring stations and dispersion modeling by AERMOD. Results demonstrated that benzene and H2S concentrations originated from the oil refinery could violate ambient air quality limits in adjacent area. SO2 and NO2 were found the other two most important pollutants emitted from the refinery since ambient NO2 and SO2 concentrations originated from the oil refinery could reach up to 50% of the standard levels even at far locations from the refinery. Results also demonstrated that the refinery did not have significant health impact in terms of xylenes and toluene emissions as they could reach to 8 to 10% of the strictest criteria. The refinery did not seem to affect the air quality of surrounding environment by ethylbenzene and CO emissions as predicted values of ambient concentrations for these pollutants are well below the air quality standards. Gases dispersion modeling results along with the measured odour concentration and character around the oil refinery revealed that toluene, xylenes, H2S, SO2 play important roles in posing odour problems by the oil refinery. A multilinear regression model which related OC to these odorant concentrations were developed using 70% of data and validated using 30% of data (r=0.48). The study concluded that these odorants along with ethyl and methyl mercaptans (emission data for them was not available) could be considered as odour indicators for the oil refinery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,288 | 0,168 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».