MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7053445017

Unity diversity and the standardization of clinical pharmacy service

2017· book· en· W7053445017 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga) · 2017
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiquePlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClinical pharmacyPharmacyStandardizationMultistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence ExaminationPharmacy practiceScope (computer science)Subject (documents)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The original idea of ACCP came from Asian pharmacists who were looking for a practical conference at which they could exchange and share ideas on the concept of clinical pharmacy. In 1996, representatives from China, Korea, Japan, and USA met in Seoul, Korea to plan for the first conference. As a result, the first East Asia Conference on Developing Clinical Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy Education (EACDCPPE) was held in America in 1997. Only 36 representatives attended and pioneers planned it as bi-annual meeting.
\nIn 1999, the second EACDCPPE was successively held in Shanghai. This conference enabled more representatives in Asian countries to realize the differences between Asian and Western countries in the development of clinical pharmacy. When the third conference was held in Japan in 2003, the title of the conference was changed to Asian Conference on Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP). This opened the conference to more Asian countries; also the subject of clinical pharmacy was more strengthened. With a series of
\nother Asian countries such as Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, and so on attending ACCP, as well as
\nwith the rapid development of clinical pharmacy in Asia, every country was enthusiastic about attending
\nand holding this conference. At the 5th conference in Malaysia in 2005, the decision was made among
\nthe representatives of the member countries to hold the conference annually instead of biannually for
\nefficiency and convenience in regard to communicating and sharing about clinical pharmacy.
\nDuring the past 20 years, ACCP has been a major event in the clinical pharmacy scope in Asia and has
\nbeen conducted in various countries especially in Asia. Clinical pharmacists have attended this prestigious
\nmeeting to share their experience in the fields of practice, research, and education on clinical pharmacy.
\nClinical pharmacist experts from USA, Canada, Australia, and UK have continuously come to transfer
\ntheir knowledge and shared advance clinical pharmacy practice experiences. This conference supports
\nrapid knowledge and experience transfer and enhances the emergence of clinical pharmacy practice in
\nAsia.
\nIndonesia hosted the 8th ACCP in Surabaya in 2008, and again this year Indonesia has successfully
\nhosted the 17th ACCP in Yogyakarta from 28th to 30th July 2017. This year’s conference was also a
\ncelebration of 20 years of ACCP with the theme “ Unity in Diversity and the Standardisation of Clinical
\nPharmacy Services/’ At ACCP 2017, there were 6 preconfcrcncc workshops, poster sessions consisted of
\n199 posters, 21 oral presentation sessions consisted of a total of 142 oral presentations, and there were
\nsymposiums with 47 speakers, 2 plenary sessions with 4 speakers and 4 keynote speeches regarding various current issues in clinical pharmacy. About 1 ,133 participants attended the conference from 16 different countries.
\nThis ACCP 2017 proceeding provides an opportunity for readers to engage with selected papers presented at the 17th ACCP 2017. This book is also a valuable contribution to gaining a better understanding about the development of clinical pharmacy particularly in Asian countries and the future global
\nchallenges. Readers will find a broad range of research reports on topics of clinical pharmacy, social and
\nadministrative pharmacy, pharmacy education, pharmacocconomics, pharmacoepidemiology and other
\ntopics in pharmacy. The readers will also discover both common challenges and creative solutions emerging from diverse settings in developing clinical pharmacy services.
\nThe editors would like to thank all those who have contributed to submit full papers for this 17th ACCP conference. We received 119 papers from the conference and after a rigorous peer-review, 68 papers were accepted for publication in this proceeding of which 56 arc from Indonesia and 12 from Australia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. We would like to express our special appreciation and sincere thanks to the scientific committee and the reviewers who have selected and reviewed the papers, and also the technical editor’s team (Ms Aric Sulistyarini and Ms Muffarihah ) who helped carry out the page layout and check the consistency of the papers with the publisher's template. It is a great honour to publish selected papers in this proceeding by CRC Press/Balkema (Taylor & Francis Group). Our special gratitude goes to the steering committee, the chairman of the conference and the members of the organizing committee involved in preparing and organizing the conference. Finally, we would like to thank Universitas Airlangga, Indonesian Pharmacist Association, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta and Universitas Sanata Dharma for their endless support during the conference. Last, but not least, we also place on record our sense of gratitude to one and all who, directly or indirectly, have lent a helping hand to this conference

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,883
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga)Même sujetPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207