MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7053493254

Unmet Mental Health Needs and Barriers to Mental Health Treatment Among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis in the NARCOMS Registry

2024· dissertation· en· W7053493254 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Établissements canadiensRegional Municipality of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMental healthAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)Psychological interventionDepression (economics)Multiple sclerosisSocioeconomic statusComorbidity
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background – Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurological disease. Mental health comorbidities, such as depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder, are highly prevalent in persons with MS, and their presence is associated with adverse health and economic consequences. Unfortunately, these conditions are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. To better meet the mental health needs of MS patients, it is important to identify the correlates, barriers and consequences associated with untreated mental health comorbidities. Previous studies have generally found socioeconomic factors (e.g., inadequate health insurance, low education) to limit access to mental health care; however, the findings for sociodemographic (i.e., age, race, ethnicity) and clinical factors (i.e., severity of mental health symptoms and level of physical impairment) have been less consistent. While qualitative investigations of MS patients have identified common barriers to mental health treatment, these barriers have been poorly investigated in larger samples of MS patients. Further research is needed to identify disparities in the use of mental health services for the treatment of mental health comorbidities in persons with MS.
\n
\nResearch Aims – Cross-sectionally, this thesis aimed to assess the prevalence and correlates of untreated mental health comorbidities in persons with MS. This thesis also explored the prevalence and correlates of treatment barriers (in those not receiving treatment) and treatment modalities (in those receiving treatment). Longitudinally, this thesis aimed to assess the temporal association between baseline mental health non-treatment and depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life outcomes (mental and physical domains) at one-year follow-up. 
\n
\nMethods – To address these aims, this thesis utilized cross-sectional (2011) and longitudinal (2011 to 2012) data captured by the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. The NARCOMS Spring 2011 Survey had a total of 9765 respondents; 3928 of whom were diagnosed with one or more of depression, anxiety or bipolar disorder. Mental health comorbidities were explored separately for all our analyses, resulting in three non-mutually exclusive baseline samples: depression (n=3589), anxiety (n=1487), and bipolar disorder (n=196). Other than initial descriptive data, statistical analyses were restricted to the depression and anxiety cohorts due to the small number of participants with bipolar disorder. Baseline respondents who responded to key outcomes (depressive symptoms, HRQOL scores) on the NARCOMS Spring 2012 Survey were included in follow-up analyses. Cross-sectionally, bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations between participant characteristics (with a focus on sociodemographic characteristics) and mental health non-treatment. The barriers to mental health treatment were explored in bivariate analyses through the lens of Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilization. Longitudinally, bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the temporal association between baseline mental health non-treatment and depressive symptoms (NARCOMS Depression Scale) and HRQOL quality of life outcomes (MCS-12 and PCS-12 scores on the RAND-12) at one-year follow-up. Multivariable regression analyses adjusted for baseline scores (NARCOMS Depression Scale and RAND-12 scores) and relevant baseline sociodemographic and clinical confounders. 
\n
\nResults – In 2011, NARCOMS participants were more commonly untreated for anxiety (26.1%; 95%CI=23.9, 28.3) and bipolar disorder (23.5%; 95%CI=17.5, 29.4), followed by depression (15.2%; 95%CI=14.0, 16.4). In adjusted analyses, participants with younger and older ages (vs. 45 to 64 years; the former significant for depression cohort only), racialized participants (significant for depression cohort only), and those with low SES (health insurance for depression cohort, education for anxiety cohort) had significantly higher odds of mental health non-treatment. Participants with clinically meaningful depressive symptoms and those with more severe levels of disability had significantly lower odds of non-treatment. Of those not receiving treatment, participants were most commonly untreated due to need factors (i.e., “not having symptoms now”) (depression cohort: 57.4%, 313/545; anxiety cohort: 65.2%, 253/388), followed by predisposing factors (depression cohort: 43.1%, 235/545; anxiety cohort: 32.5%, 126/388) and enabling factors (depression cohort: 19.5%, 106/545; anxiety cohort: 22.2%, 86/388). Participants with low SES were significantly more likely to report enabling factors but less likely to report need factors as barriers to mental health treatment. Of those receiving treatment, less than one-third of participants were treated with both psychotherapy and medication (depression cohort: 20.1%, 611/3044; anxiety cohort: 27.7%, 304/1099). Participants with low education were less likely to receive the recommended treatment combination of psychotherapy and medication. Approximately two-thirds of treated participants reported clinically meaningful depressive symptoms (depression cohort: 63.3%, 1927/3044; anxiety cohort: 65.1%, 715/1099). After adjusting for key confounders (baseline scores, as well as other sociodemographic and clinical factors), baseline mental health non-treatment was not associated with the presence of clinically meaningful depressive symptoms or a clinically meaningful decline in mental or physical HRQOL at one-year follow-up. 
\n
\nConclusion – The findings of this thesis add to the literature by identifying important sociodemographic and clinical correlates of mental health service use and later health outcomes in MS patients to be considered in future research. Targeting the barriers identified in this thesis may improve access to mental health care for disadvantaged MS patients. To build upon the results of this thesis, future investigations could utilize multiple data sources (administrative, clinical and registry data) to assess the prevalence and correlates of mental health treatment barriers in a more diverse and representative sample of persons with MS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,937

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetMagneto-Optical Properties and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207