Unmet Mental Health Needs and Barriers to Mental Health Treatment Among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis in the NARCOMS Registry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background – Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurological disease. Mental health comorbidities, such as depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder, are highly prevalent in persons with MS, and their presence is associated with adverse health and economic consequences. Unfortunately, these conditions are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. To better meet the mental health needs of MS patients, it is important to identify the correlates, barriers and consequences associated with untreated mental health comorbidities. Previous studies have generally found socioeconomic factors (e.g., inadequate health insurance, low education) to limit access to mental health care; however, the findings for sociodemographic (i.e., age, race, ethnicity) and clinical factors (i.e., severity of mental health symptoms and level of physical impairment) have been less consistent. While qualitative investigations of MS patients have identified common barriers to mental health treatment, these barriers have been poorly investigated in larger samples of MS patients. Further research is needed to identify disparities in the use of mental health services for the treatment of mental health comorbidities in persons with MS. \n \nResearch Aims – Cross-sectionally, this thesis aimed to assess the prevalence and correlates of untreated mental health comorbidities in persons with MS. This thesis also explored the prevalence and correlates of treatment barriers (in those not receiving treatment) and treatment modalities (in those receiving treatment). Longitudinally, this thesis aimed to assess the temporal association between baseline mental health non-treatment and depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life outcomes (mental and physical domains) at one-year follow-up. \n \nMethods – To address these aims, this thesis utilized cross-sectional (2011) and longitudinal (2011 to 2012) data captured by the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. The NARCOMS Spring 2011 Survey had a total of 9765 respondents; 3928 of whom were diagnosed with one or more of depression, anxiety or bipolar disorder. Mental health comorbidities were explored separately for all our analyses, resulting in three non-mutually exclusive baseline samples: depression (n=3589), anxiety (n=1487), and bipolar disorder (n=196). Other than initial descriptive data, statistical analyses were restricted to the depression and anxiety cohorts due to the small number of participants with bipolar disorder. Baseline respondents who responded to key outcomes (depressive symptoms, HRQOL scores) on the NARCOMS Spring 2012 Survey were included in follow-up analyses. Cross-sectionally, bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations between participant characteristics (with a focus on sociodemographic characteristics) and mental health non-treatment. The barriers to mental health treatment were explored in bivariate analyses through the lens of Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilization. Longitudinally, bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the temporal association between baseline mental health non-treatment and depressive symptoms (NARCOMS Depression Scale) and HRQOL quality of life outcomes (MCS-12 and PCS-12 scores on the RAND-12) at one-year follow-up. Multivariable regression analyses adjusted for baseline scores (NARCOMS Depression Scale and RAND-12 scores) and relevant baseline sociodemographic and clinical confounders. \n \nResults – In 2011, NARCOMS participants were more commonly untreated for anxiety (26.1%; 95%CI=23.9, 28.3) and bipolar disorder (23.5%; 95%CI=17.5, 29.4), followed by depression (15.2%; 95%CI=14.0, 16.4). In adjusted analyses, participants with younger and older ages (vs. 45 to 64 years; the former significant for depression cohort only), racialized participants (significant for depression cohort only), and those with low SES (health insurance for depression cohort, education for anxiety cohort) had significantly higher odds of mental health non-treatment. Participants with clinically meaningful depressive symptoms and those with more severe levels of disability had significantly lower odds of non-treatment. Of those not receiving treatment, participants were most commonly untreated due to need factors (i.e., “not having symptoms now”) (depression cohort: 57.4%, 313/545; anxiety cohort: 65.2%, 253/388), followed by predisposing factors (depression cohort: 43.1%, 235/545; anxiety cohort: 32.5%, 126/388) and enabling factors (depression cohort: 19.5%, 106/545; anxiety cohort: 22.2%, 86/388). Participants with low SES were significantly more likely to report enabling factors but less likely to report need factors as barriers to mental health treatment. Of those receiving treatment, less than one-third of participants were treated with both psychotherapy and medication (depression cohort: 20.1%, 611/3044; anxiety cohort: 27.7%, 304/1099). Participants with low education were less likely to receive the recommended treatment combination of psychotherapy and medication. Approximately two-thirds of treated participants reported clinically meaningful depressive symptoms (depression cohort: 63.3%, 1927/3044; anxiety cohort: 65.1%, 715/1099). After adjusting for key confounders (baseline scores, as well as other sociodemographic and clinical factors), baseline mental health non-treatment was not associated with the presence of clinically meaningful depressive symptoms or a clinically meaningful decline in mental or physical HRQOL at one-year follow-up. \n \nConclusion – The findings of this thesis add to the literature by identifying important sociodemographic and clinical correlates of mental health service use and later health outcomes in MS patients to be considered in future research. Targeting the barriers identified in this thesis may improve access to mental health care for disadvantaged MS patients. To build upon the results of this thesis, future investigations could utilize multiple data sources (administrative, clinical and registry data) to assess the prevalence and correlates of mental health treatment barriers in a more diverse and representative sample of persons with MS.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».